2017
DOI: 10.1007/s41745-017-0054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Framework for Understanding Eye–Hand Coordination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They proved that neural fields competing in visual perception versus dexterous command may converge into a single command mode, which will induce extremely short reaction times, which are shorter than commonly achieved. Their finding is clearly task dependent [4,5,6,7] and sustained by Weiler et al [8]. We exploit by proof of principle in Section 2 and Section 4 (via a mathematical FitzHugh-Nagumo model of the sensorimotor system, for short FHN) that a reduction of RTs is stable in a new states of mind outside their previously obtained RT, which was a comfort behavioral zone of athletes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…They proved that neural fields competing in visual perception versus dexterous command may converge into a single command mode, which will induce extremely short reaction times, which are shorter than commonly achieved. Their finding is clearly task dependent [4,5,6,7] and sustained by Weiler et al [8]. We exploit by proof of principle in Section 2 and Section 4 (via a mathematical FitzHugh-Nagumo model of the sensorimotor system, for short FHN) that a reduction of RTs is stable in a new states of mind outside their previously obtained RT, which was a comfort behavioral zone of athletes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Only one system is to be trained, which is advantageous for old brains with some loss of connectivity between the eyes and brain. This confluence was conjectured by Jana et al [ 83 ] and studied via simulation research [ 84 , 85 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A Linear Accumulation to Threshold with Ergodic Rate (LATER) model has been used to successfully account for reaction time data in eye and hand movement tasks (Asrress and Carpenter 2001; Carpenter and Williams 1995; Dean et al 2011; Gopal and Murthy 2015; Jana et al 2017). The use of a LATER model was largely motivated by its relative simplicity and the ability to quantify the parameters that describe motor recruitment and its association with movement initiation and not necessarily indicative of the underlying neural mechanisms per se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%