2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-016-0391-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational cognitive model of self-efficacy and daily adherence in mHealth

Abstract: Mobile health (mHealth) applications provide an excellent opportunity for collecting rich, fine-grained data necessary for understanding and predicting day-to-day health behavior change dynamics. A computational predictive model (ACT-R-DStress) is presented and fit to individual daily adherence in 28-day mHealth exercise programs. The ACT-R-DStress model refines the psychological construct of self-efficacy. To explain and predict the dynamics of self-efficacy and predict individual performance of targeted beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, we assisted the first attempts of developing computational models based on self-efficacy theory in order to promote PA [29,30]. Self-efficacy theory is particularly suitable to be modeled because of its nature that is explicitly dynamic (i.e., it takes into account time-varying information such as individual achievements, self-efficacy beliefs and expectations) and, thus, permits adapting the intervention to the individual over the course of the intervention itself [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, we assisted the first attempts of developing computational models based on self-efficacy theory in order to promote PA [29,30]. Self-efficacy theory is particularly suitable to be modeled because of its nature that is explicitly dynamic (i.e., it takes into account time-varying information such as individual achievements, self-efficacy beliefs and expectations) and, thus, permits adapting the intervention to the individual over the course of the intervention itself [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First computational models of self-efficacy focused on different approaches and frameworks. Pirolli [30] proposed a computational model, called ACT-R-DStress, aiming to (i) model interactions among behavioral goals, memories of past experiences, and behavioral performance, and (ii) explains and predict both the dynamics of self-efficacy and the individual performance in an exercise program. For these purposes the ACT-R-DStress exploited the computational neurocognitive architecture that characterizes the ACT-R theory's simulation environment [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants may benefit from just-in-time, scheduled, and self-triggered reminders to consider relevant ERB that they can take to reduce health risks from smoke episodes (Pirolli, 2016;Pirolli et al, 2017). The smartphone platform provides an avenue to enhance social normative learning and to evaluate the impact of risk and behavior messages to those who are affected by smoke.…”
Section: Advances Using Citizen Science and Smartphone Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application provides a platform for testing different behavioral mechanisms such as implementation intentions, which help people translate goal intentions into behaviors. Participants may benefit from just-in-time, scheduled, and self-triggered reminders to consider relevant ERB that they can take to reduce health risks from smoke episodes (Pirolli, 2016;Pirolli et al, 2017). Smartphone applications have been shown to influence human behavior.…”
Section: Advances Using Citizen Science and Smartphone Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adaptive intervention that modulated exercise difficulty to user ability increased adherence when compared to statically scheduled controls [17]. The computational model in [30] suggests that the individualized modulation of exercise difficulty affects selfefficacy which in turn determined adherence rates. While these interventions may be effective, they involve major restructuring of systems.…”
Section: Adherence and Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%