2018
DOI: 10.1145/3182393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Architecture for Coupling Heterogeneous Numerical Models and Computing Coupled Derivatives

Abstract: One of the challenges in computational modeling is coupling models to solve multidisciplinary problems. Flow-based computational frameworks alleviate part of the challenge through a modular approach, where data flows from component to component. However, existing flow-based frameworks are inefficient when coupled derivatives are needed for optimization. To address this, we develop the modular analysis and unified derivatives (MAUD) architecture. MAUD formulates the multidisciplinary model as a nonlinear system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the unsteady interaction between tower and blade has been simulated for the NREL Phase VI RWT with EllipSys3D using overset grid capabilities, and an overall good agreement was found with experimental data (Zahle et al, 2009). EllipSys3D has been used in various rotor applications to perform computations, such as aerodynamic power (Johansen et al, 2009) and fluid-structure interaction (Heinz et al, 2016). The latter work also encompasses a comparison across fidelities between the CFD-based tool, HAWC2CFD, and the BEM-based HAWC2 solvers where a good agreement was found.…”
Section: Ellipsys3dmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, the unsteady interaction between tower and blade has been simulated for the NREL Phase VI RWT with EllipSys3D using overset grid capabilities, and an overall good agreement was found with experimental data (Zahle et al, 2009). EllipSys3D has been used in various rotor applications to perform computations, such as aerodynamic power (Johansen et al, 2009) and fluid-structure interaction (Heinz et al, 2016). The latter work also encompasses a comparison across fidelities between the CFD-based tool, HAWC2CFD, and the BEM-based HAWC2 solvers where a good agreement was found.…”
Section: Ellipsys3dmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since these methods are so central to the functionality of Dymos, their derivation is very briefly summarized here. Much more complete and detailed explanations of the analytic methods can be found in the work of Martins and Hwang [20,21].…”
Section: Model Derivative Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the effort required, a given implementation is typically uni-directional, supporting either the direct or adjoint methods, but not both. However, recent theoretical developments by Martins and Hwang [20,21] have provided a more generalized approach that has been implemented in NASA's OpenMDAO framework, eliminating the need for one-off implementations of the analytic derivative methods. As-such the implementation barrier to adopting analytic derivative methods has been significantly lowered and it has also become possible to apply a combination of forward and adjoint methods on a single problem to create a bi-directional analytic derivative approach.…”
Section: Model Derivative Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this work, we use OpenMDAO [14] as the underlying optimization framework. OpenMDAO was developed at NASA Glenn and uses the modular analysis and unified derivatives theory to allow for modular construction and execution of complicated models [20]. OpenMDAO has been used to optimize a variety of problems, including wind turbines [21,22], boundary layer ingestion aircraft [23,24], thermodynamic engine cycles [25,26], and coupled thermal-mission problems [6,27].…”
Section: Tools and Physics Used In This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%