2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2022.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational approach for 3D modeling and integration of heterogeneous geo-data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern further continues, with a higher occurrence of lower-plasticity soils at depths of 3.0 m and 6.0 m. The traditional and improved formulations of the modified IDW algorithms integrated into the GIS and GEE tools showed significant differences in areal coverage percent. For instance, the difference in areal coverage percent for medium-plasticity (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and high-plasticity (17-30) soil was found to be 23%. In addition, by incorporating the hill-shade effect, the GIS-based prediction model delineated sharp ridges in the prediction grid (figure 4 GEE-based GSMs for SPT-N comprised RMSE and MAE ranges between 0.92-2.1, while the NSE and 𝑅 2 ranged between 0.86 − 0.95 (figure 5 (d1)).…”
Section: Pi-based Gsmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern further continues, with a higher occurrence of lower-plasticity soils at depths of 3.0 m and 6.0 m. The traditional and improved formulations of the modified IDW algorithms integrated into the GIS and GEE tools showed significant differences in areal coverage percent. For instance, the difference in areal coverage percent for medium-plasticity (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and high-plasticity (17-30) soil was found to be 23%. In addition, by incorporating the hill-shade effect, the GIS-based prediction model delineated sharp ridges in the prediction grid (figure 4 GEE-based GSMs for SPT-N comprised RMSE and MAE ranges between 0.92-2.1, while the NSE and 𝑅 2 ranged between 0.86 − 0.95 (figure 5 (d1)).…”
Section: Pi-based Gsmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these advancements, a notable research gap prevails in applying these techniques to develop geotechnical soil maps (GSMs), which is primarily attributed to significant variability in subsurface properties within a small grid [11]. However, the potential of advanced interpolation methods, particularly the improved formulation of the modified IDW algorithm integrated with the GEE platform, to accurately depict subsurface characteristics has yet to be fully explored and understood considering heterogeneous geotechnical facets [12,13]. This domain provides fertile ground for research, particularly to enhance GSMs precision and reliability, which are critical for informed geotechnical and geological decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D models digitally represent shape and features of real objects or phenomena characterised by a three-dimensional nature, i.e., having a spatial extension, which can also bear knowledge in relation to the context of use. In medicine, for example, 3D images are commonly used in diagnostics; in the cultural heritage sector, the digitisation of artistic or archaeological works is increasingly used for conservation, dissemination, and support for documentation and restoration; in the geosciences, 3D models are used for environmental monitoring and risk assessment [8,9], and so on. Furthermore, digital representations enable the application of mathematical models and algorithms to perform analysis, simulation, prediction, that are useful in responding to societal demands and needs.…”
Section: Background On 3d Modeling In the Ui Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%