2010
DOI: 10.5802/afst.1211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computation of invariants of a rational self-map

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
147
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Y ). As X is general, lines which are special in X are parameterized by a smooth surface Σ sp ⊂F (X) (see [6]). …”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 23 Let Us Say That a Linementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Y ). As X is general, lines which are special in X are parameterized by a smooth surface Σ sp ⊂F (X) (see [6]). …”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 23 Let Us Say That a Linementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When X contains no plane, the indeterminacy locus of φ is exactly the surface Σ sp , along which the plane P l above is not unique. Furthermore, the indeterminacies of the map φ are solved after blowing-up the surface Σ sp , and the induced morphismφ: F (X)!F (X) is finite if X is general (see [6]). Note that the condition on a line l ⊂Y to being good will be implied by the slightly stronger fact that l is non-special in X (so φ is well defined at [l ]) and for no point…”
Section: Proof Of Proposition 23 Let Us Say That a Linementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, we may assume by induction on l that φ l−1 is generically defined along Σ b . Then φ l−1 (Σ b ) must be a surface, as proved in [1]. If φ l were not generically defined along Σ b , then φ l−1 (Σ b ) would be contained in the indeterminacy locus of φ.…”
Section: Proposition 21 Under This Assumption the Zariski Closure Omentioning
confidence: 81%
“…If φ l were not generically defined along Σ b , then φ l−1 (Σ b ) would be contained in the indeterminacy locus of φ. But this indeterminacy locus is a surface of general type ( [1]), hence cannot be dominated by a surface which is birationally equivalent to an abelian surface.…”
Section: Proposition 21 Under This Assumption the Zariski Closure Omentioning
confidence: 99%