2018
DOI: 10.1109/taslp.2018.2851144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Compressed Sensing Framework for Dynamic Sound-Field Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the recordings, white Gaussian measurement noise was added at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of 10 dB, 20 dB, and 30 dB, respectively. To evaluate spatial RIR recovery, we use the normalized system misalignment (NSM) as in [23,24], which measures the energy ratio between the error signal and the corresponding true RIR. Accordingly, the mean NSM (MNSM) is used to describe the reconstruction error over Ω.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the recordings, white Gaussian measurement noise was added at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of 10 dB, 20 dB, and 30 dB, respectively. To evaluate spatial RIR recovery, we use the normalized system misalignment (NSM) as in [23,24], which measures the energy ratio between the error signal and the corresponding true RIR. Accordingly, the mean NSM (MNSM) is used to describe the reconstruction error over Ω.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high number of parameters for D = 3 and the dynamic-sample representation in terms of spatially concentrated, fast decaying interpolation filters most likely lead to ill-posed or even underdetermined problems in practical applications. The solution to this issues is the compressedsensing based recovery as proposed in [24]. This involves addition sparsity constraints and sampling conditions.…”
Section: Interpretation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations