2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2014.7026021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compressed sensing-based pan-sharpening using joint data fidelity and blind blurring kernel estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We denote k as a blurring kernel. An averaging kernel [19], [29], [48] is widely used for k, since its experimental results are comparable with other results using estimated kernels [20], [21]. The likelihood p(y|x) can be defined as…”
Section: Spectral Preservation Likelihood P(y|x)mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We denote k as a blurring kernel. An averaging kernel [19], [29], [48] is widely used for k, since its experimental results are comparable with other results using estimated kernels [20], [21]. The likelihood p(y|x) can be defined as…”
Section: Spectral Preservation Likelihood P(y|x)mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Prior p(x): Natural image gradients contain edge-based structures and follow a heavy-tailed distribution learnt from generic image databases [24], [25]. We assume that image gradients are piecewise continuous, and the first-order gradient distribution of the HRMS image x is defined by a Laplacian distribution [21], [26] with location zero and scale s 1 , and the second-order gradient distribution of x obeys a Laplacian distribution with…”
Section: Spectral Preservation Likelihood P(y|x)mentioning
confidence: 99%