2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive validation of the SMAP Enhanced Level-3 Soil Moisture product using ground measurements over varied climates and landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
8
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). SMAP satellite soil moisture has an average unbiased root mean square error (ubRMSE) in a range from 0.04-0.055 (m 3 /m 3 ) (Chan et al, 2018;Colliander et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019) which is close to SMAP mission's ubRMSE requirement. While SMAP soil moisture has shown a better performance compared to other satellite soil moisture products (Stillman and Zeng, 2018), however, it is also found that SMOS and SMAP soil moisture dry-downs are more rapid than in-situ observations following rainfall events (Rondinelli et al, 2015;Shellito et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5). SMAP satellite soil moisture has an average unbiased root mean square error (ubRMSE) in a range from 0.04-0.055 (m 3 /m 3 ) (Chan et al, 2018;Colliander et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2019) which is close to SMAP mission's ubRMSE requirement. While SMAP soil moisture has shown a better performance compared to other satellite soil moisture products (Stillman and Zeng, 2018), however, it is also found that SMOS and SMAP soil moisture dry-downs are more rapid than in-situ observations following rainfall events (Rondinelli et al, 2015;Shellito et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The 9 km SM data can provide a more detailed SM distribution and more adequate SM values than the 36 km SMAP SM data [80][81][82]. Although the SMAP SM products with the unbiased root mean square error (ubRMSE) requirement of the SMAP mission (0.04 cm 3 /cm 3 ) have a satisfactory accuracy, the products are still affected by many complex factors (e.g., topography, vegetation, surface temperature,' and RFI).…”
Section: Rf-based Downscaling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active and passive microwave satellite-based remote sensing has been considered an effective instrument for monitoring SM on a global scale because of its unique, strong relationship with the soil dielectric constant [17]. Passive L-band microwave remote sensing with frequent revisiting time is recognized as the most promising tool for mapping the regional and global SM distribution [18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assessment of the reliability of SMAP soil moisture (SM) retrievals is undeniably essential to improve its quality and evaluate its potential application in hydrology, climate, and natural disasters (drought, flood, etc.). A variety of methods or studies, for example, field campaigns, core validation stations, sparse ground networks, land surface model simulations, and inter-comparisons among satellites, have been used or conducted for extensive validation/assessment of SMAP SM retrievals since the relevant products were published in April 2015 [17,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Recently, the soil moisture information from the SMAP-enhanced level three and modeled level four, spanning from April 2015 to November 2017, have been assessed against model-based SPoRT-LIS and in situ observations via statistical metrics over the United States [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation