2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-00933-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Update of the Superior Hypogastric Block for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the present results suggested that ganglion impar block may not sufficiently interrupt somatic malignant painful stimulation, although it showed more effective response in patients with cancer-related pain than in those with non-cancer-related pain. In addition, because the superior hypogastric plexus also carries visceral nociceptive stimuli from pelvic organs [22], pelvic organ cancer-related pain in non-responsive patients may have been mediated by the superior hypogastric plexus as well as the ganglion impar. This may also explain why some cancer-related pain did not respond to ganglion impar block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the present results suggested that ganglion impar block may not sufficiently interrupt somatic malignant painful stimulation, although it showed more effective response in patients with cancer-related pain than in those with non-cancer-related pain. In addition, because the superior hypogastric plexus also carries visceral nociceptive stimuli from pelvic organs [22], pelvic organ cancer-related pain in non-responsive patients may have been mediated by the superior hypogastric plexus as well as the ganglion impar. This may also explain why some cancer-related pain did not respond to ganglion impar block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) is indicated for pelvic visceral pain and pelvic cancer pain. The classic technique of SHPB described by Plancarte et al in 1990 was a fluoroscopy-guided, posterior, two-needle approach [18][19][20]. This classic technique was found to reduce pain in 70%-90% of patients experiencing pelvic pain secondary to cervical, prostate, and testicular cancer or radiation injury [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic technique of SHPB described by Plancarte et al in 1990 was a fluoroscopy-guided, posterior, two-needle approach [18][19][20]. This classic technique was found to reduce pain in 70%-90% of patients experiencing pelvic pain secondary to cervical, prostate, and testicular cancer or radiation injury [18,19]. Another study found similar outcomes when performing the SHPB using the classic technique on 180 patients with visceral pelvic pain associated with malignancy (55% being cervical cancer and 11% with ovarian cancer), with a 55.5% pain reduction found at 33 months [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations