A Comprehensive Survey on Cryptography Evaluation in Mobile (MANETs)

Bulla, Suneetha

doi:10.17762/turcomat.v12i2.2402

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Efforts have been made to evaluate the algorithms' performances to determine their applicability to different information security requirements. Existing comparative studies have shown conflicting findings, and the selection of cryptographic algorithms used for comparison has been heavily weighted toward symmetric encryption techniques [8], [9]. Therefore, an attempt was made to strengthen some existing studies with the results obtained from the current study, and, in addition, both symmetric and asymmetric encryption/decryption algorithms were chosen for comparison in this study, as opposed to just symmetric algorithms in most previous studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

In-Depth Assessment of Cryptographic Algorithms Namely DES, 3DES, AES, RSA, and Blowfish

2023

IJCCCE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Securing information is difficult in the modern internet era, as terabytes of data are generated daily online and online transactions occur virtually every second. The current world's information security relies heavily on cryptography, which makes the internet a safer environment. Making information incoherent to an unauthorized person is done through the use of cryptography. Providing legitimate users with confidentiality as a result. There are a wide variety of cryptographic algorithms suitable for this purpose. An ideal cryptography method would allow the user to do their job without breaking the bank. Unfortunately, there is no magic formula that can address every issue.Several algorithms balance cost and performance. A banking application needs robust security at a high cost, while a gaming software that sends user patterns for analytics cares more about speed and cost. Thus, choosing the appropriate encryption technique for the user. This study offers important insights in the process of selecting cryptographic algorithms in terms of each algorithm's strengths, weaknesses, cost, and performance . In order to demonstrate an entire performance analysis in this article, as opposed to just theoretical comparisons, this research developed and thoroughly examined the cost and performance of commonly used cryptographic algorithms, including DES, 3DES, AES, RSA, and blowfish. According to the findings, blowfish requires the smallest amount of time to decrypt files of various sizes (25K, 50K, 1M, 2M, 3M, and 4M), and it also consumes the smallest amount of memory. This makes it approximately three times faster than other cryptographic algorithms. Index Terms— Cryptograph Algorithm, Security attacks , Key, Cipher.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

In-Depth Assessment of Cryptographic Algorithms Namely DES, 3DES, AES, RSA, and Blowfish

2023

IJCCCE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Hybrid RSA–AES-Based Software-Defined Network to Improve the Security of MANET

Walle

2024

Open Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Software-defined networking offers a flexible and programmatically efficient network design. Security in today’s ad hoc mobile wireless network is paramount and incredibly challenging. Software-defined network is used to automatically and dynamically manage and control large network devices, network services, traffic paths, network topology, and packet management (quality of service). Recently different attackers are attacking our data when forwarding from one device to another. Therefore, software-defined networking and a Hybrid Rivest, Shamir, and Adelman (RSA)–Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) cryptography algorithm are needed to establish the concept of software-defined networking in mobile ad hoc networks to improve security and routing efficiency. The proposed Hybrid Cryptography Algorithm (HCA)-Based SDN mainly creates strong detection, prevention, and authentication mechanisms for MANET. The proposed secure data channel throughput increased by 0.4%, and the suggested system latency was 3.6% lower than the Normal MANET. It is already proved that the Hybrid cryptography algorithm also generates a key for security faster than RSA (Rivest, Shamir, and Adelman). The performance of the RSA–AES (hybrid) approach for encrypting and decrypting broad data significantly beats the RSA-Blowfish algorithm. In decrypting files, the hybrid approach (RSA–AES) outperforms the RSA-Blowfish method 11.2 times more efficiently when the file size is 32 kB; however, efficiency is increased by 77.1 times when the file size exceeds 4,096 kB. The experimental result shows that as the file size increases the hybrid RSA–AES solution outperforms RSA when the file is only 145 bytes; however, when the file is 6,460 bytes in size, the efficiency is multiplied by 61.3. As file size increases, RSA is less efficient than the hybrid encryption method. This is more preferred to be implemented for different parts of wireless networks like MANET.

show abstract

A Comprehensive Survey on Cryptography Evaluation in Mobile (MANETs)

Cited by 2 publications

References 26 publications

In-Depth Assessment of Cryptographic Algorithms Namely DES, 3DES, AES, RSA, and Blowfish

In-Depth Assessment of Cryptographic Algorithms Namely DES, 3DES, AES, RSA, and Blowfish

Hybrid RSA–AES-Based Software-Defined Network to Improve the Security of MANET

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About