2014
DOI: 10.1021/ja509937k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Study of Extended Tetrathiafulvalene Cruciform Molecules for Molecular Electronics: Synthesis and Electrical Transport Measurements

Abstract: Cruciform-like molecules with two orthogonally placed π-conjugated systems have in recent years attracted significant interest for their potential use as molecular wires in molecular electronics. Here we present synthetic protocols for a large selection of cruciform molecules based on oligo(phenyleneethynylene) (OPE) and tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) scaffolds, end-capped with acetyl-protected thiolates as electrode anchoring groups. The molecules were subjected to a comprehensive study of their conducting properti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded, however, that it is reasonable to compare our G M values with conductances determined using MCBJ, with the caveat that the G M values may be slight underestimates. As MCBJ conductances have been shown to be comparable with those obtained using STM‐BJ, it follows that comparisons with STM‐BJ data are also valid.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It can be concluded, however, that it is reasonable to compare our G M values with conductances determined using MCBJ, with the caveat that the G M values may be slight underestimates. As MCBJ conductances have been shown to be comparable with those obtained using STM‐BJ, it follows that comparisons with STM‐BJ data are also valid.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…[21] Our cAFM method results in slightly lower conductances for both SpP (log G M /G 0 = À3.78 vs.log G/G 0 = À3.2 [21] )and SmP (log G M / G 0 = À4.17 vs.l og G/G 0 = À3.9 [21] ); ac omparable deviation between cAFM and MCBJ has been observed previously. [22] Such discrepancies may result from differences in the nature of the junctions or assumptions made when calculating G M from G J .Itcan be concluded, however, that it is reasonable to compare our G M values with conductances determined using MCBJ,w ith the caveat that the G M values may be slight underestimates.AsMCBJ conductances have been shown to be comparable with those obtained using STM-BJ, [15,23] it follows that comparisons with STM-BJ data are also valid.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiesupporting
confidence: 57%
“…One aim was to achieve good and tunable conducting properties by virtue of the different conjugation pathways that exist between the individual parts of the molecule [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. These DTF-based cruciform molecular wires have demonstrated potential promising applications in molecular electronics and also provided a good platform for the investigation of the dependence of conducting properties on their molecular structures [24][25][26]. As a continuation of our work on such extended TTF compounds, it is interesting to further investigate their applications in organic electronic devices, such as OFETs, the basic component of organic circuits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%