Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1968613.1968739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive study of delivery strategies with chunk scheduling for mesh P2P live streaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This policy guarantees higher video chunk availability and prevents peer starvation [3]. The push and pull mechanism in rarest first algorithm relies on chunk rarity, which represents the occurrence of an individual chunk among the neighbors.…”
Section: Rarest First Push-pullmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This policy guarantees higher video chunk availability and prevents peer starvation [3]. The push and pull mechanism in rarest first algorithm relies on chunk rarity, which represents the occurrence of an individual chunk among the neighbors.…”
Section: Rarest First Push-pullmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSF prevents that any chunk could be shared more times than the others, as a result, the availability of every piece is the same. To achieve this strategy requires global knowledge about the distribution of all chunks in the whole network [23] [19].…”
Section: Least-shared Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respectively peers always selects the available chunk with the higher priority, i.e., a peer never downloads a chunk with priority i if it has not a chunk with priority i+1. Given that the download/upload scheduling policy strictly obeys a sequential priority, peers can not accept out-of-order chunks even if the bandwith utilization allows it [22] [23].…”
Section: Sequentialmentioning
confidence: 99%