2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2023.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive study into false positive rates for ‘other’ biological samples using common presumptive testing methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of these reagents can contaminate the samples, and will also lower the concentration of analytes by dilution. They can also be prone to false-positive and false-negative results, depending on the specificity of their chemical mechanism of action, by both opposing biofluids [ 1 ] and unrelated substances [ 2 ]. Some need to be viewed under specialist conditions, for example, the use of Luminol for the presumptive detection of blood is best observed in the dark with highly sensitive camera equipment, as the chemiluminescence is weak and short lived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of these reagents can contaminate the samples, and will also lower the concentration of analytes by dilution. They can also be prone to false-positive and false-negative results, depending on the specificity of their chemical mechanism of action, by both opposing biofluids [ 1 ] and unrelated substances [ 2 ]. Some need to be viewed under specialist conditions, for example, the use of Luminol for the presumptive detection of blood is best observed in the dark with highly sensitive camera equipment, as the chemiluminescence is weak and short lived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%