2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive review on resolving ambiguities in natural language processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, requirements written in natural language are often ambiguous. The ambiguity may lead to software failures and a waste of time (Yadav et al 2021). Using formal requirement specification languages can rarely deal with ambiguity well, often resulting in misunderstandings being documented in the 10 unambiguous requirements (Kamsties et al 2001).…”
Section: Ambiguity In Requirements Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, requirements written in natural language are often ambiguous. The ambiguity may lead to software failures and a waste of time (Yadav et al 2021). Using formal requirement specification languages can rarely deal with ambiguity well, often resulting in misunderstandings being documented in the 10 unambiguous requirements (Kamsties et al 2001).…”
Section: Ambiguity In Requirements Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue of ambiguity in text-image translation can be solved by establishing an intermediary medium for delivering user expectations. 8 Language-based models can be applied to tackle specific design aspects and not the holistic complexity of the design activity. Generative deep learning models, such as StyleGAN, can be used for different design tasks, and a language model (i.e., CLIP) for certain tasks within the design workflow.…”
Section: Shermeen Yousifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be trained to determine that two texts are semantically identical even when the wording is significantly different. [3]. A model of this kind was developed [4]- [6] and utilized to group customer input into subjects, resulting in a more compelling customer feedback monitoring process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%