2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/8965712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Review of Computation-Based Metal-Binding Prediction Approaches at the Residue Level

Abstract: Clear evidence has shown that metal ions strongly connect and delicately tune the dynamic homeostasis in living bodies. They have been proved to be associated with protein structure, stability, regulation, and function. Even small changes in the concentration of metal ions can shift their effects from natural beneficial functions to harmful. This leads to degenerative diseases, malignant tumors, and cancers. Accurate characterizations and predictions of metalloproteins at the residue level promise informative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
(240 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identity of the HEK293T cells was confirmed using short tandem repeat analysis. The HEK293T cell line has the following short tandem repeat profile: TH01 (7, 9.3); D21S11 (28, 29, 30.2); D5S818 (7,8,9); D13S317 (11,12,13,14,15); D7S820 (11); D16S539 (9, 13); CSF1PO (11,12,13); Amelogenin (X); vWA (16,18,19,20); TPOX (11). This profile matches 100% to HEK293T cell line profile (CRL-3216; ATCC) if the Alternative Master's algorithm is used, and 83% if the Tanabe algorithm is used.…”
Section: Cell Culture Protein Expression and Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identity of the HEK293T cells was confirmed using short tandem repeat analysis. The HEK293T cell line has the following short tandem repeat profile: TH01 (7, 9.3); D21S11 (28, 29, 30.2); D5S818 (7,8,9); D13S317 (11,12,13,14,15); D7S820 (11); D16S539 (9, 13); CSF1PO (11,12,13); Amelogenin (X); vWA (16,18,19,20); TPOX (11). This profile matches 100% to HEK293T cell line profile (CRL-3216; ATCC) if the Alternative Master's algorithm is used, and 83% if the Tanabe algorithm is used.…”
Section: Cell Culture Protein Expression and Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decades of research has been dedicated to discovering computational approaches that can accurately predict the metal ions as well as the positions where they bind to the proteins [3, 17, 8, 5]. A comprehensive review of recent advances in computational approaches for predicting metal binding sites can be found in [30]. Broadly, these approaches can be categorized into following three groups based on the type of attributes they take into account: 1) structure-based methods that use three dimensional secondary structure of proteins as primary data; 2) sequence-based methods that use amino acid sequence as primary data; and 3) combined methods that leverage both structure and sequence attributes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the abundance and importance of metal ions in proteins, knowledge about their binding is crucial for our understanding of biological systems. Experimental techniques, like X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, or cryogenic electron microscopy, provide the most reliable information on this topic, but we can quickly run into problems with their cost, time consumption, or automation of the processes. , When experimental data are difficult to obtain in a timely manner, we can turn to computational methods which allow for relatively quick and easy identification of metal binding sites. Most of them are based either upon analyzing the amino acid sequence of a given protein or upon finding structural motifs that are analogous with the ones in known, well-characterized metal binding proteins. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Some methods combine sequence and structural information, for example, MetSite, 20 IonCom, 11 or 3DLigandSite. 21 Many methods also employ machine learning approaches to predict metal binding, 6 among these are the already listed IonSeq and IonCom 11 tools; a recent example on predicting the Ca Mg 2+ ligand binding with a deep neural network can be found in ref 22. Many of the above listed software tools limit the range of metal ions they detect by focusing only on specific amino acid residues.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%