2018
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2018.22184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive review of air gap membrane distillation process

Abstract: a b s t r a c tMembrane distillation (MD) is a promising thermally driven membrane separation technique. In MD, water vapor is being separated from the hot feed water solution using a microporous hydrophobic membrane, due to the difference in temperature, and hence vapor pressure, across the membrane. Air gap membrane distillation (AGMD) process is one of the common configurations of applying the MD process for water desalination and other applications. In AGMD, a stagnant air gap is introduced between the mem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 242 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass transfer coefficient is proportional to porosity and the fact that O 2 plasma etching increases porosity suggests that it plays a dominant role in the permeate flux increase of all plasma treated membranes. 62 Due to its largest pore size, the plasma treated PTFE 1 membrane yields, as expected, the highest flux at 10.9 L/(m 2 h) when compared to the other plasma treated PTFE membranes (Figure 5C). However, in addition to wetting control, plasma treatment enables the permeate water fluxes of the plasma treated PTFE 0.1 and PTFE 0.2 membranes to exceed that of the untreated PTFE 1 membrane.…”
Section: Air Gap Membrane Distillation Performancesupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mass transfer coefficient is proportional to porosity and the fact that O 2 plasma etching increases porosity suggests that it plays a dominant role in the permeate flux increase of all plasma treated membranes. 62 Due to its largest pore size, the plasma treated PTFE 1 membrane yields, as expected, the highest flux at 10.9 L/(m 2 h) when compared to the other plasma treated PTFE membranes (Figure 5C). However, in addition to wetting control, plasma treatment enables the permeate water fluxes of the plasma treated PTFE 0.1 and PTFE 0.2 membranes to exceed that of the untreated PTFE 1 membrane.…”
Section: Air Gap Membrane Distillation Performancesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Plasma treated membranes exhibit lower tortuosity (improved pore shape) and increased porosity values compared to untreated ones (Table ). Mass transfer coefficient is proportional to porosity and the fact that O 2 plasma etching increases porosity suggests that it plays a dominant role in the permeate flux increase of all plasma treated membranes …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to high mass transfer resistance at permeate side, the flux is less as compared with other configurations. The air gap reduces the conduction heat loss from feed to permeate [8][9][10].…”
Section: Air Gap Membrane Distillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat transfer coefficients h f and h p can be calculated using Nusselt number relation as shown in Eq. (10), while the h m can be calculated from Eq. (3).…”
Section: Overall Heat Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2 , there are four known and well-studied membrane distillation configurations: DCMD, AGMD, SGMD and VMD [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. There are also known three supplemental configurations: liquid or water gap membrane distillation (LGMD/WGMD), thermostatic sweeping gas membrane distillation (TSGMD) and vacuum-assisted air gap membrane distillation (VA-AGMD) [ 35 , 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Membrane Distillation Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%