2021
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies

Abstract: Gene regulatory network (GRN) is the important mechanism of maintaining life process, controlling biochemical reaction and regulating compound level, which plays an important role in various organisms and systems. Reconstructing GRN can help us to understand the molecular mechanism of organisms and to reveal the essential rules of a large number of biological processes and reactions in organisms. Various outstanding network reconstruction algorithms use specific assumptions that affect prediction accuracy, in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DPM (Ghanbari et al, 2019), sdcorGCN (Pardo-Diaz et al, 2021), PIDC (Zhao et al, 2016;Chan et al, 2017). These approaches (reviewed in (Fiers et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2021;Emmert-Streib et al, 2012)) are based on the assumption that a change in TF This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Tfs As Part Of Gene Regulatory Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DPM (Ghanbari et al, 2019), sdcorGCN (Pardo-Diaz et al, 2021), PIDC (Zhao et al, 2016;Chan et al, 2017). These approaches (reviewed in (Fiers et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2021;Emmert-Streib et al, 2012)) are based on the assumption that a change in TF This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Tfs As Part Of Gene Regulatory Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another set of methods are based on coexpression of TFs and genes (e.g., WGCNA [108]), with some variations that use energy-based or information-based measures instead of correlation (e.g., DPM [109], sdcorGCN [110], PIDC [111,112]. These approaches (reviewed in [113][114][115]) are based on the assumption that a change in TF expression level will result in a transcriptional change of its regulon. Despite the significant progress and numerous practical applications of co-expression to GRN inference their direct interpretation in terms of gene regulation is limited due to missing directionality.…”
Section: Tfs As Part Of Gene Regulatory Network (Grn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a large number of regulations should be removed from the derived network. We next use the dynamic model ( 9) with function (10) to remove regulations that has less impact on the system dynamics. With such a large number of regulations in the network, the removal of one or two regulations has limited effects on the system dynamics.…”
Section: Inference Network With Less Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inference methods for constructing regulatory networks can be mainly classified into three major types, namely the correlation-based methods, dynamic model methods and machine learning methods [9][10][11]. The correlation-based methods use one or more statistical qualities to measure the relationship between pairs of variables in a network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple computational methods can be used to learn GRNs from observational data, including correlation analysis [ 20 , 29 , 34 ], Boolean networks [ 31 , 36 ], Bayesian networks [ 5 , 12 , 59 ], differential equation models [ 60 , 61 ] and machine learning approaches [ 19 ]. A recent benchmarking study [ 63 ] revealed no clear winner among different methods for GRN reconstruction, with different methods demonstrating advantages in different settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%