2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
106
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…have applied various multi attribute decision making (MADM) techniques [6]. A model to rank various renewable and non-renewable electricity production technologies was proposed by Stein by utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) based on four comprehensive criteria: financial, technical, environmental and socio-economic-political [7]. In order to evaluate the energy alternatives and create a roadmap of energy strategies for Turkey, Erdogan et al [8] proposed a hybrid MCDM methodology that included AHP and TOPSIS based on type-2 fuzzy sets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have applied various multi attribute decision making (MADM) techniques [6]. A model to rank various renewable and non-renewable electricity production technologies was proposed by Stein by utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) based on four comprehensive criteria: financial, technical, environmental and socio-economic-political [7]. In order to evaluate the energy alternatives and create a roadmap of energy strategies for Turkey, Erdogan et al [8] proposed a hybrid MCDM methodology that included AHP and TOPSIS based on type-2 fuzzy sets.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, if results are consistent, the attractiveness can be calculated. A sensitivity analysis can be conducted to reduce uncertainty (Stein, 2013). As this method also uses pairwise comparison, even though on a ratio scale, requirement 3 is difficult to accomplish.…”
Section: ® Measuring Attractiveness By the Categorical-based Evaluatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of WtE technologies is performed to gather data and determine suitable evaluation criteria for both India and the UK. The criteria considered encompass a range of financial, technological, environmental and economic factors, and are comparable to those used in similar technology evaluation studies (Hokkanen and Salminen, 1997;Aravossis, et al, 2001;Nixon, et al, 2013b;Stein, 2013;and Ahmad and Tahar, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%