2018
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8920
| View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Maceration in different media can yield large textural changes in both peanut species, for both baking and frying. Maceration in glucose solutions can induce much larger textural changes than maceration in water. Quantitative data on alveolation show that microstructure disruption through steam generation cannot explain all the texture differences among processed peanuts. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specimens were tested for porosity, density, the volume of isolated pores, interconnected pores and crust thickness using an X-ray micro-CT (Phoenix V|tome|x M, Waygate Technologies, Germany) (Lykomitros et al, 2018). The 3D inner morphology was analyzed using a peak energy level of 100 kV and a constant current of 80 A was used where each specimen was placed on the stage and fixed to the rotating assembly.…”
Section: Structural Properties Of Optimized Gulab Jamunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results illustrated that air temperature influenced the texture of peanut kernel. It may be due to that hot air with higher temperature could accelerate the heat and mass transfer rates, which led to the microstructure disrupted 29,30 . Moreover, higher temperature may affect the structures and the intermolecular forces of protein, starch and fat in the peanut kernel, which resulted in the texture changes of peanut kernels.…”
Section: Physical Physiological and Chemical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%