2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2011.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
360
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 605 publications
(399 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
360
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Validation is assessment of model accuracy by way of comparison of simulation results with experimental measurements [2]. Thus, we used some experimental data offered by NASA Langley [13] and other researchers to validate our model.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Validation is assessment of model accuracy by way of comparison of simulation results with experimental measurements [2]. Thus, we used some experimental data offered by NASA Langley [13] and other researchers to validate our model.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characterization of the numerical approximation errors associated with a simulation is called verification [1]. In other words, verification is concerned with whether the code is solving the chosen equations correctly and error-free while the validation deals with physics and addresses the appropriateness of the model [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it requires complete probability information for the random process, which could be quite difficult, if not impossible. Modeling epistemic uncertainty, referring to the uncertainty due to lack of knowledge [20], requires the exploration of the alternatives of probabilistic approaches. In the past few decades, possibility theory [6] and Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory [21], have been explored and studied in the uncertainty quantification literature for a better representation of the epistemic uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%