2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive framework for thermoeconomic analysis of desalination systems

Abstract: Highlights A full treatment for thermoeconmic analysis of desalination systems is presented. A detailed review is conducted to highlight the correlations of important economic parameters. A discussion on cost balance equations for important desalination components is presented. A sample model is developed for mechanical vapor compression desalination systems. The monetary value of each stream is calculated using releva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multi-location (six locations in Saudi Arabia) analysis has concluded that the highest annual output is noted for Sharurah and lowest for Dhahran. Similarly, Jamil et al [34] also reported the thermoeconomics of desalination system and concluded that the levelized cost of water production can be variable for various type of desalination system, for example, the production cost of reverse osmosis, mechanical vapour compression, multi-effect evaporation/desalination, multistage flash, and thermal vapour compression are 0.9 ± 0.3$/m 3 , 1.0 ± 0.5$/m 3 , 1.5 ± 0.5$/m 3 , 2.0 ± 0.5$/m 3 , and 2.7 ± 0.8$/m 3 , respectively. Likewise, Jamil et al [34] presented that the hybrid desalination plants like energy recovery devices along with the reverse osmosis can have the lowest water production cost at 0.7 ± 0.2$/m 3 , leading us to the conclusion that further system improvement is needed to cope with the uncertain water security situation in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A multi-location (six locations in Saudi Arabia) analysis has concluded that the highest annual output is noted for Sharurah and lowest for Dhahran. Similarly, Jamil et al [34] also reported the thermoeconomics of desalination system and concluded that the levelized cost of water production can be variable for various type of desalination system, for example, the production cost of reverse osmosis, mechanical vapour compression, multi-effect evaporation/desalination, multistage flash, and thermal vapour compression are 0.9 ± 0.3$/m 3 , 1.0 ± 0.5$/m 3 , 1.5 ± 0.5$/m 3 , 2.0 ± 0.5$/m 3 , and 2.7 ± 0.8$/m 3 , respectively. Likewise, Jamil et al [34] presented that the hybrid desalination plants like energy recovery devices along with the reverse osmosis can have the lowest water production cost at 0.7 ± 0.2$/m 3 , leading us to the conclusion that further system improvement is needed to cope with the uncertain water security situation in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For each component, an exergoeconomic analysis is performed for both configurations as described above. The cost flow method is applied to the system as given by [51][52][53][54][55]. In this method, the cost of each flow stream of the system through all components is calculated by combining the fixed cost and stream cost.…”
Section: Exergoeconomic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive theoretical framework for a componentbased exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of the whole plant is presented in Eq. 47-57 [92].…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%