2022 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/icorr55369.2022.9896547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Framework for the Modelling of Cartesian Force Output in Human Limbs

Abstract: Neuromuscular functional electrical stimulation represents a valid technique for functional rehabilitation or, in the form of a neuroprosthesis, for the assistance of neurological patients. However, the selected stimulation of single muscles through surface electrodes remains challenging particularly for the upper extremity. In this paper, we present the MyoCeption, a comprehensive setup, which enables intuitive modeling of the user's musculoskeletal system, as well as proportional stimulation of the muscles w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the purpose of condition 4 is to verify whether any benefit deriving from the FES device's calibration are due to the geometrical adjustments of the musculoskeletal model or due to the adjustment to stimulation intensity, the expected outcome in the latter case would have been a better performance than using the non-calibrated FES device, but worse than the fully calibrated condition. The fact that the correlation is worse than both C2 and C3 would seem to indicate that the most likely cause of this decrease in performance is fatigue and other progressive effects, which are well documented in FES applications [26,27]. In this regard, the study design could have benefited from randomizing the order of conditions C2-C4, or at the very least from allowing more resting time between trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While the purpose of condition 4 is to verify whether any benefit deriving from the FES device's calibration are due to the geometrical adjustments of the musculoskeletal model or due to the adjustment to stimulation intensity, the expected outcome in the latter case would have been a better performance than using the non-calibrated FES device, but worse than the fully calibrated condition. The fact that the correlation is worse than both C2 and C3 would seem to indicate that the most likely cause of this decrease in performance is fatigue and other progressive effects, which are well documented in FES applications [26,27]. In this regard, the study design could have benefited from randomizing the order of conditions C2-C4, or at the very least from allowing more resting time between trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at possible implementations using such a regression machine in order to control a FES setup, the results reported in the works by Schearer et al [12] and Friedrich et al [28] can be helpful, mainly because of their finding that muscle stimulation can be modelled as combining linearly in the force output space. As demonstrated in [27], this fact can be employed to design ridge regression-based FES controllers which can facilitate movement with a time-effective calibration procedure, once the electrodes are in place. The work by Schearer et al, in particular, presents an experiment which employs a setup in many ways identical to that adopted in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations