2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive framework for hard-magnetic beams: Reduced-order theory, 3D simulations, and experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which is linear to the thickness h. The adequacy of neglecting high-order terms in η 3 will be justified in Section 7 through validation against experiments in a variety of test cases. Also, we remark that in recent work on hard-magnetic beams (Yan et al, 2021a), rods (Sano et al, 2022), and shells (Yan et al, 2021b), the zero-order term of the magnetic potential has been shown to be sufficient in describing the mechanical behavior of these various structures under magnetic actuation.…”
Section: Reduced Magnetic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…which is linear to the thickness h. The adequacy of neglecting high-order terms in η 3 will be justified in Section 7 through validation against experiments in a variety of test cases. Also, we remark that in recent work on hard-magnetic beams (Yan et al, 2021a), rods (Sano et al, 2022), and shells (Yan et al, 2021b), the zero-order term of the magnetic potential has been shown to be sufficient in describing the mechanical behavior of these various structures under magnetic actuation.…”
Section: Reduced Magnetic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This magnetic field was axial and uniform in the central region between the coils. The setup we used was similar to that reported in Yan et al (2021a) but with coils of different sizes. Here, we chose a pair of bigger coils (inner diameter 190 mm, outer diameter 283 mm, height 54 mm) or a pair of small coils (inner diameter 86 mm, outer diameter 152 mm, height 33 mm) depending on the size of the specimen.…”
Section: Generation Of the Magnetic And Pressure Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, Zhao et al [24] developed a continuum formulation with an asymmetric Cauchy stress tensor, which is very similar to the classical continuum theory in the sense that it neither needs non-classical material parameters nor additional degrees of freedom. Their theory has been the foundation for the analysis of hard-magnetic soft beams (HMSBs) in Wang et al [33], Chen et al [34,35], Rajan and Arockiarajan [36], and Yan et al [37] among others. The same formulation has been employed to model the deformation of magnetoactive shells by Yan et al [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%