2022
DOI: 10.3390/su141710709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Evaluation Method for the Service Status of Groins in Waterways Based on an AHP-Improved CRITIC Combination Weighting Optimization Model

Abstract: A comprehensive evaluation model that combines an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method and the improved version of the Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method is proposed to solve integrated assessment problems related to the service status of groins in waterways. In view of the influencing factors and functional characteristics of damaged groins for waterway regulation, a waterway groin service status (WGSS) evaluation index system with a hierarchical structure was construc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Equation (4), is the weight of indicator j , is the correlation coefficient between indicators i and j , and is the standard deviation of indicator j . Finally, the subjective weights calculated by the AHP method and the objective weights calculated by the CRITIC method are combined to obtain comprehensive weights [ 47 ]. The calculation formula is shown in Equation (5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Equation (4), is the weight of indicator j , is the correlation coefficient between indicators i and j , and is the standard deviation of indicator j . Finally, the subjective weights calculated by the AHP method and the objective weights calculated by the CRITIC method are combined to obtain comprehensive weights [ 47 ]. The calculation formula is shown in Equation (5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the more scientific approach is to combine the subjective weighting method with the objective weighting method, that is, the combination weighting method. Some scholars used the combination weighting method in their academic research [37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Combination Weighting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the objective weighting method, known as the CRITIC method [9] , is employed. The CRITIC method is a better objective weighting method than the entropy weight method and the standard deviation method.…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%