2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-021-02272-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive enhancer screen identifies TRAM2 as a key and novel mediator of YAP oncogenesis

Abstract: Background Frequent activation of the co-transcriptional factor YAP is observed in a large number of solid tumors. Activated YAP associates with enhancer loci via TEAD4-DNA-binding protein and stimulates cancer aggressiveness. Although thousands of YAP/TEAD4 binding-sites are annotated, their functional importance is unknown. Here, we aim at further identification of enhancer elements that are required for YAP functions. Results We first apply geno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top 10 CpGs with the most significant P -value corresponded to 6 genes: BCL11A (cg24361098), TMCO4 (cg04738197), MICALCL (cg01518090), GRAP2 (cg21012238), TRAM2 (cg15085626), and KIRREL (cg10570484). While these genes have not been reported to be associated with bladder cancer outcomes, they have been reported to be involved in mechanisms promoting cancer development in tumors [ 49 52 ] or blood [ 53 , 54 ]. Although we measured blood methylation in this study, we plan to measure tumor methylation and will explore the association of CpGs in these genes with NMIBC outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top 10 CpGs with the most significant P -value corresponded to 6 genes: BCL11A (cg24361098), TMCO4 (cg04738197), MICALCL (cg01518090), GRAP2 (cg21012238), TRAM2 (cg15085626), and KIRREL (cg10570484). While these genes have not been reported to be associated with bladder cancer outcomes, they have been reported to be involved in mechanisms promoting cancer development in tumors [ 49 52 ] or blood [ 53 , 54 ]. Although we measured blood methylation in this study, we plan to measure tumor methylation and will explore the association of CpGs in these genes with NMIBC outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PGK.CCNK-eGFP.IRES.mCherry.cppt.EF1a.PuroR CCNK-stability reporter was a gift from Mikolaj Slabicki (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA) (S1abicki et al, 2020). Lentivirus was produced, DLD1 cells infected and selected as described (Li et al, 2021). Using FlowJo (BD Biosciences), the geometric mean of the eGFP and mCherry fluorescent signal for living cells was calculated.…”
Section: Quantification Of Ccnk Degradation Using the Ccnk-egfp Reportermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 48 h, eGFP-positive cells were sorted using a FACSAria TM II Cell Sorter and cells were seeded again in 6-well plates for assessment of viability over time using the ATPlite assay. For other experiments involving knock-out cell lines, lentivirus was produced and cells were infected and selected as described (Li et al, 2021).…”
Section: Quantification Of Ccnk Degradation Using the Ccnk-egfp Reportermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies concerning the activity of YAP/TAZ as transcriptional coactivators were focused on the analysis of the promoter-driven transcription of a few available target genes (e.g., CTFG and CYR61) [28,85]. This view was radically changed by the implementation of high-resolution and high-throughput technologies, as ChIP-seq, which allow the genomewide mapping of YAP/TAZ-bound loci in several systems [36,39,43,86]. These studies provided unequivocal evidence that YAP/TAZ prevalently bind genomic regions that are distal to promoters and which are, by enlarge, marked by histone posttranslational modifications such as H3K27ac and H3K4me1.…”
Section: Yap/taz Regulate Enhancersmentioning
confidence: 99%