2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive comparison of recent developed meta-heuristic algorithms for streamflow time series forecasting problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four performance measures are selected to evaluate the models’ performances, namely the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and ranking mean (RM). MAE, RMSE, and R 2 have been commonly used in SSL prediction studies 2 , 8 10 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 37 , 38 , 69 , while RM was used by Ahmed et al 70 as a method to rank overall model performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four performance measures are selected to evaluate the models’ performances, namely the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and ranking mean (RM). MAE, RMSE, and R 2 have been commonly used in SSL prediction studies 2 , 8 10 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 37 , 38 , 69 , while RM was used by Ahmed et al 70 as a method to rank overall model performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PSO, the inertia weight was set to linearly decrease from 0.9 to 0.4. Two coefficient values were both set to 2 (Ahmed et al 2021). For WCA, the total number of rivers and seas and the maximum allowable distance between the river and sea were set to 10 and 1e-3 (Eskandar et al 2012;Zhang et al 2021b), respectively.…”
Section: Cv-metaheuristic-svr and Nonparametric Friedman Test For Enh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As listed in Table 7 in the Appendix, in previous performance comparisons, only the deterministic optimal estimation was considered, and only a single-run comparison was conducted. However, due to the inherent stochastic nature of these algorithms (Gao et al 2020;Ahmed et al 2021), the same metaheuristic algorithm may yield different optimal solutions in multiple runs (Ahmed et al 2021). The solutions in even superior models deviate strongly for a given case, which means that ideal results from a single run are hard to replicate on similar cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the JA technique outperformed other selected algorithms compared with searching for the best solution. In addition to that, recently, different advanced optimization techniques are proposed as robust techniques to be used in searching for the best solution in dealing with water resources issues [26]. For example, the waterdrop optimization technique [38], the whale optimization algorithm [39], the ant lion optimization algorithm [40], the nomadic people optimization algorithm [41], the Harris hawks optimization algorithm [42], and the grey wolf optimization technique [27].…”
Section: Reliability and Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaheuristic techniques proved to be more reliable for dam operation [24,25]. However, some of the developed optimization algorithms have some limitations, such as a low rate of converging, and require extensive parameters for isolating and preventing problems [26]. Hence, there is a need to investigate reliable optimization techniques, overcoming the drawbacks of other optimization techniques, to ensure no overdraw from dams occurs and improve flood control planning and design requirements for the respective basins; optimizing operation release management strategies for dams must be achieved to resolve the issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%