2020
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2020.2964876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Comparison of Extended and Unscented Kalman Filters for Speed-Sensorless Control Applications of Induction Motors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, eliminating the speed-sensor in electric drive systems, namely speed-sensorless control, reduce cost, hardware complexity, and maintenance requirements while increasing the reliability of the electric drive system. For this purpose, many model-based estimators/observers have been proposed in the literature, such as model reference adaptive systems [19,20], full-order observers [21,22], extended Luenberger observers [23,24], extended and unscented Kalman filters (EKF and UKF) [25][26][27], and sliding mode observers [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, eliminating the speed-sensor in electric drive systems, namely speed-sensorless control, reduce cost, hardware complexity, and maintenance requirements while increasing the reliability of the electric drive system. For this purpose, many model-based estimators/observers have been proposed in the literature, such as model reference adaptive systems [19,20], full-order observers [21,22], extended Luenberger observers [23,24], extended and unscented Kalman filters (EKF and UKF) [25][26][27], and sliding mode observers [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the other methods, nonlinear Kalman filtering (NKF) methods (i.e., EKF and UKF) provide a stochastic approach to state/parameter estimation problem by taking into account the process and measurement noises. A very recent study [27] in which EKF and UKF observers are compared for speed-sensorless control applications of IM states that EKF is still the best option with low computational complexity and an estimation performance similar to UKF. However, NKF methods require a stochastic system with complete dynamic and measurement equations to perform optimal estimations, and in many practical applications, those are either unknown or partially known [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speed, load torque, and efficiency are estimated by an IM model-based EKF [31]. Stator currents, rotor fluxes, load including viscous friction are estimated using EKF and UKF algorithms [32]. In the paper, primitive KF is utilized for the filtration of stator current vector components in case of unknown IM model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model‐based methods using two‐phase IM models are the most popular methods thanks to their easy implementation and satisfactory performance apart from extra‐low speeds. Hence, different model‐based methods such as model reference adaptive systems, 2,3 full‐order observers, 4,5 sliding mode observers, 6,7 nonlinear Luenberger observers, 8,9 and nonlinear Kalman filters 10,11 have been introduced. Although all those methods are based on the machine model, they can also be classified as deterministic 2‐9 and stochastic 10,11 approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, Q and R may vary depending on the operating conditions; therefore, they should be updated online for further improvement in estimation performance. In addition, Yildiz et al 10 make a comprehensive comparison of the most popular two NKFs, extended and unscented Kalman filters (EKF and UKF), for speed‐sensorless control applications. Authors emphasize that the computational load of UKF is about six times higher than that of EKF although their estimation performances are very similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%