2020
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1731500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive clinical study of integrins in acute lymphoblastic leukemia indicates a role of α6/CD49f in persistent minimal residual disease and α5 in the colonization of cerebrospinal fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study investigating the mRNA and protein surface expression of integrins in ALL failed to confirm the proposed association between MRD and α4/CD49d or α5 mRNA in a large patient group. The strongest association with MRD was instead found for α6/CD49f (79). The reason for these discrepancies is currently unknown.…”
Section: Adhesion and Chemoresistance Of All Within The Bone Marrowmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study investigating the mRNA and protein surface expression of integrins in ALL failed to confirm the proposed association between MRD and α4/CD49d or α5 mRNA in a large patient group. The strongest association with MRD was instead found for α6/CD49f (79). The reason for these discrepancies is currently unknown.…”
Section: Adhesion and Chemoresistance Of All Within The Bone Marrowmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, integrin regulation is highly complex and what defines integrin function is integrin activation and the resulting ligand affinity of specific integrin heterodimers, rather than the levels of individual integrin subunits per se. Hence, studies addressing affinity states of α4:β1, such as the work of Shalapour et al (75) are likely closer to revealing the association of α4:β1with MRD than studies based entirely on expression profiles, such as the work of Scharff et al Also, the work of Scharff et al did not specifically address Ph + ALL, which may be the reason why an association between MRD and α5 was not seen (79).…”
Section: Adhesion and Chemoresistance Of All Within The Bone Marrowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As blocking of integrins did not affect uptake of the BCP-ALL-derived exosomes, binding and uptake to HiBCPP cells may obviously follow multiple pathways and differ between exosomes from the various cell lines. Although we did not quantify the expression of the various integrins on exosomes, we hypothesize that these were prevalent on the extracellular vesicles, since all three ALL cell lines express the evaluated integrins [36][37][38].…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Exosome Uptake To Hibcpp Cellsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Integrin a 6 dimerizes with b 1 to form VLA-6 (186) or with b 4 to form a 6 b 4, which is also known as TSP-180 (187). a 6 has been suggested to be a biomarker for minimal residual disease since it is expressed on pre-B-ALL at diagnosis, and the signal is preserved or expressed with a higher intensity after therapy (10,188). a 6 was found to be expressed significantly more strongly not only in relapsed B-ALL but also in ecotropic viral integration site-1 positive (EVI1 + ) AML cases.…”
Section: Integrin a 5 (Cd49e)mentioning
confidence: 99%