2017
DOI: 10.1515/mper-2017-0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comprehensive Assessment Model for Critical Infrastructure Protection

Abstract: International business demands seamless service and IT-infrastructure throughout the entire supply chain. However, dependencies between different parts of this vulnerable ecosystem form a fragile web. Assessment of the financial effects of any abnormalities in any part of the network is demanded in order to protect this network in a financially viable way. Contractual environment between the actors in a supply chain, different business domains and functions requires a management model, which enables a network … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparative exploration of approaches to managing risks related to hazardous incidents and critical infrastructure outages has been carried out by Krings et al [67]. Häyhtiö and Zaerens [68] proposed a risk management model to assess financial differences between centralized and decentralized protection of CIs. A general overview on the problem of protecting CIs has been discussed by Capano [69].…”
Section: Cluster#1 "Risk Assessment" (39 Documents)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative exploration of approaches to managing risks related to hazardous incidents and critical infrastructure outages has been carried out by Krings et al [67]. Häyhtiö and Zaerens [68] proposed a risk management model to assess financial differences between centralized and decentralized protection of CIs. A general overview on the problem of protecting CIs has been discussed by Capano [69].…”
Section: Cluster#1 "Risk Assessment" (39 Documents)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33],  using CI as variables when estimating the vulnerability of various areas to flooding [34], [35],  the impact of CI on national security in the domains of economic development, state sovereignty, and improvement of the overall standard of living [36], [37],  the mutual interactions between CI systems [38], [39],  dependent risk [40], [41],  methods from the domain of management science which can be adapted to the management of CI safety [42],  methods of exchanging information on threats to which CI facilities are vulnerable [43], [44],  establishing a safety threshold for the functionality of CI facilities [45], [46].…”
Section: A Critical Infrastructure Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• methods from the domain of management science which can be adapted to issues management of CI safety (Ouyang, 2014;Hurley, 2017;Cai et al, 2017;Tien and Kiureghain, 2017;Johansen and Tien, 2018), • methods for exchange of information on the threats to which CI facilities are vulnerable (Caldwell, 2015;Häyhtiö and Zaerens, 2017), • establishing a safety threshold 3 for the functionality of CI facilities (Manas, 2017;Hatton et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Protection Of Critical Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of a proposal for a holistic solution that would create a set of safeguards based on the threats to which CI is vulnerable. The majority of research only indicates the need to develop dedicated methods and define the framework model for CI safety management (Hofreiter and Zvakova, 2016;Häyhtiö and Zaerens, 2017).…”
Section: The Protection Of Critical Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation