Abstract:Background
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Post-treatment, patients suffer from side effects and have various rehabilitation needs, which means that individualization is fundamental for optimal rehabilitation. This systematic review (SR) of SRs aims to evaluate the current evidence on rehabilitation interventions in female patients following BC treatment.
Methods
Full-text SRs published in English from 2009 were searched in Embas… Show more
“…Whereas in two studies, 50% of the included SR were assessed as “moderate” and “high” quality . Also, the results of our assessments of the quality and RoB of SR/MA are consistent with other studies using tools such as the AMSTAR, OQAQ, or PRISMA Checklist . In the bariatrics, in two overviews of the SR, the quality assessed in the AMSTAR was moderate, but it was based only on a few studies in comparison with our sample of 78 SR/MA.…”
Summary
High‐quality systematic reviews (SR) and meta‐analyses (MA) are considered to be reliable sources of information. This study aims to assess the quality of studies published as SR or MA in the field of bariatrics in 2016 and 2017. We identified SR and MA in the field of bariatrics by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). Eligible studies were those identified as SR/MA in the title/abstract, which aimed to assess any outcome in patients with morbid obesity undergoing or scheduled to undergo bariatric surgery. Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts, assessed full texts of potentially eligible studies, and assessed the quality of included studies. Any discrepancies were resolved by the third reviewer. We evaluated the quality and risk of bias of each SR/MA using AMSTAR 2 checklist and ROBIS tool, respectively. Seventy‐eight of 4236 references met inclusion criteria and were assessed for their quality/risk of bias. The methodological quality of 99% of all papers was classified as “critically low.” A total of 6% of the studies were at low risk of bias, and 78% were assessed as being at high risk of bias. The methodological quality of studies published in 2016 and 2017 as SR/MA is highly unsatisfactory.
“…Whereas in two studies, 50% of the included SR were assessed as “moderate” and “high” quality . Also, the results of our assessments of the quality and RoB of SR/MA are consistent with other studies using tools such as the AMSTAR, OQAQ, or PRISMA Checklist . In the bariatrics, in two overviews of the SR, the quality assessed in the AMSTAR was moderate, but it was based only on a few studies in comparison with our sample of 78 SR/MA.…”
Summary
High‐quality systematic reviews (SR) and meta‐analyses (MA) are considered to be reliable sources of information. This study aims to assess the quality of studies published as SR or MA in the field of bariatrics in 2016 and 2017. We identified SR and MA in the field of bariatrics by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). Eligible studies were those identified as SR/MA in the title/abstract, which aimed to assess any outcome in patients with morbid obesity undergoing or scheduled to undergo bariatric surgery. Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts, assessed full texts of potentially eligible studies, and assessed the quality of included studies. Any discrepancies were resolved by the third reviewer. We evaluated the quality and risk of bias of each SR/MA using AMSTAR 2 checklist and ROBIS tool, respectively. Seventy‐eight of 4236 references met inclusion criteria and were assessed for their quality/risk of bias. The methodological quality of 99% of all papers was classified as “critically low.” A total of 6% of the studies were at low risk of bias, and 78% were assessed as being at high risk of bias. The methodological quality of studies published in 2016 and 2017 as SR/MA is highly unsatisfactory.
“…In the same way, the use of myofascial inductions can be moderately effective [28]. However, the most solid positive effects are identified in therapeutic exercise for the reduction of the pain and in yoga with effects on the state of anxiety [29]. Active exercises show that the best results of joint recovery are achieved between the 28th and 42nd postoperative days [4].…”
“…Yoga is a meditative movement therapy that improves body conditioning, flexibility, and balance through mind-body awareness. A myriad of pilot and feasibility studies suggest that yoga may help improve quality of life ( 7–13 ), anxiety ( 9 , 14–16 ), depression ( 8 , 9 , 14–18 ), fatigue ( 13 , 17–20 ), and functional outcomes ( 13 , 21 , 22 ) in breast cancer patients and survivors who received chemotherapy ( 23 ). Although CIPN can substantially impact function and increase the risk of falls among cancer patients, only 2 small single arm (N = 10) and randomized controlled studies (N = 26, randomized to yoga, Reiki, meditation, or educational control) have evaluated the effects of yoga on improving CIPN symptoms and reducing CIPN-related falls in cancer patients ( 24 , 25 ).…”
BACKGROUND
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common, debilitating side effect that worsens quality of life and increases the risk of falls in cancer survivors. Evidence of yoga’s safety and efficacy in treating CIPN is lacking.
METHODS
In a randomized controlled study, we assigned breast and gynecological cancer survivors with persistent moderate-to-severe CIPN pain, numbness, or tingling ≥4 (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)) for ≥3 months after chemotherapy to eight weeks of usual care or yoga focused on breathwork and musculoskeletal conditioning. Primary endpoint was treatment arm differences for NRS, and secondary endpoints were Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx), and Functional Reach test after week eight. We tested treatment arm differences for each outcome measure using linear mixed models with treatment-by-time interactions. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS
We randomized 41 participants into yoga (N = 21) or usual care (N = 20). At week eight, mean NRS pain decreased by 1.95 points (95% Confidence Interval [CI]= -3.20 to -0.70) in yoga vs. 0.65 (95% CI = -1.81 to 0.51) in usual care (P = .14). FACT/GOG-Ntx improved by 4.25 (95% CI = 2.29 to 6.20) in yoga vs. 1.36 (95% CI = -0.47 to 3.19) in usual care (P = .035). Functional Reach, an objective functional measure predicting the risk of falls, improved by 7.14 cm (95% CI = 3.68 to 10.59) in yoga and decreased by 1.65 cm (95% CI = -5.00 to 1.72) in usual care (P = .001). Four grade 1 adverse events were observed in the yoga arm.
CONCLUSION
Among breast and gynecological cancer survivors with moderate-to-severe CIPN, yoga was safe and showed promising efficacy in improving CIPN symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.