2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comprehensive approach combining positive matrix factorization modeling, meteorology, and machine learning for source apportionment of surface ozone precursors: Underlying factors contributing to ozone formation in Houston, Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Process-based modeling studies to identify inconsistencies in NEI emission estimates (and trends) relative to observed pollutant levels must be pursued. The use of CTMs for multi-pollutant emission estimation and data assimilation studies, e.g., refs , together with the application of source apportionment and attribution strategies, e.g., refs , including machine-learning approaches, , provide opportunities to reduce uncertainties in these emission estimates. This should, however, be conducted in association with improvements in input and ancillary datasets that account for local heterogeneity especially land cover classification and urban development, e.g., refs and , as well as emission trends and scenarios like changes in mobile and stationary sources, e.g., ref , and even the shift to renewable energy, , increasing contribution of noncombustion sources, , all of which can drive potential shifts in chemical regimes.…”
Section: Steps Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process-based modeling studies to identify inconsistencies in NEI emission estimates (and trends) relative to observed pollutant levels must be pursued. The use of CTMs for multi-pollutant emission estimation and data assimilation studies, e.g., refs , together with the application of source apportionment and attribution strategies, e.g., refs , including machine-learning approaches, , provide opportunities to reduce uncertainties in these emission estimates. This should, however, be conducted in association with improvements in input and ancillary datasets that account for local heterogeneity especially land cover classification and urban development, e.g., refs and , as well as emission trends and scenarios like changes in mobile and stationary sources, e.g., ref , and even the shift to renewable energy, , increasing contribution of noncombustion sources, , all of which can drive potential shifts in chemical regimes.…”
Section: Steps Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the SHAP model, serving as an explanatory tool for machine learning models, has found extensive application in various studies involving PM 2.5 (Hou et al, 2022), O 3 (Ahmad et al, 2022;Cheng et al, 2023;Ghahremanloo et al, 2023;Nelson et al, 2023), precipitation (He et al, 2023;Li et al, 2023;Lin et al, 2023), and wind speed (Santos et al, 2023) investigations.…”
Section: Shapley Additive Explanation (Shap) Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%