2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11125410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Compound Fault Labeling and Diagnosis Method Based on Flight Data and BIT Record of UAV

Abstract: In the process of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) flight testing, plenty of compound faults exist, which could be composed of concurrent single faults or over-limit states alarmed by Built-In-Test (BIT) equipment. At present, there still lacks a suitable automatic labeling approach for UAV flight data, effectively utilizing the information of the BIT record. The performance of the originally employed flight data-driven fault diagnosis models based on machine learning needs to be improved as well. A compound faul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Compound Fault Labeling and Diagnosis Method is described by Zheng et al at [120]. Based on flight data and Bulit-In-Test record of the UAV, they categorize various types of faults.…”
Section: Data-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Compound Fault Labeling and Diagnosis Method is described by Zheng et al at [120]. Based on flight data and Bulit-In-Test record of the UAV, they categorize various types of faults.…”
Section: Data-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine whether the proposed two-step ensemble cost-sensitive diagnosis model (MC-LGB) can effectively play a role in the imbalanced KPG fault diagnosis compared with the diagnosis models employed on the entire UAV (the baseline GBDT and FCNN; the superb XGBoost; the extremely fast LightGBM; and the balanced modified CNN) [27], our experiment analyzed the performance of the proposed MC-LGB model in its overall diagnosis ability, total misdiagnosis cost optimization, and computing resource occupation. The performance of these classifiers was compared through the following metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, MCC, AUC, and training time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an improved method of GBDT, LightGBM employs Gradient-based One-Side Sampling (GOSS) and Exclusive Feature Bundling (EFB), known as the histogram-based algorithm, to reduce the cost of calculating the gain, to speed up training, and to occupy less memory usage [35]. It was verified on UAV test flight data that the lightning LightGBMbased diagnosis model could attain a decent performance without occupying excessive computational resources [27]. As an ensemble learning model, the LightGBM still has the great potential to be employed as a meta-classifier in complicated ensemble frameworks.…”
Section: Lightgbmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang et al [7] used interval data to reduce the dimension of flight data and realized real-time prediction of UAV faults through a BP neural network. Zheng et al [8] proposed a composite faultmarking method based on UAV flight data and BIT recorded data and diagnosed the UAV composite fault mode by using XGBoost, LightGBM, and a modified CNN algorithm. Nguyen et al [9] proposed a fault-tolerant control method based on adaptive nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control and neural network approximation, which could control the disturbance of four-axis aircraft.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Data Driven Fault Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%