2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compound attributes-based predictive model for drug induced liver injury in humans

Abstract: Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the key safety concerns in drug development. To assess the likelihood of drug candidates with potential adverse reactions of liver, we propose a compound attributes-based approach to predicting hepatobiliary disorders that are routinely reported to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Specifically, we developed a support vector machine (SVM) model with recursive feature extraction, based on physicochemical and structural proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having a single target simplifies the model: what is the likelihood that the novel structure in question can serve as a ligand for hERG? By contrast, hepatoxicity comprises a heterogenous set of compound classes including protein kinase inhibitors, herbal supplements, and anti-cancer agents (157)(158)(159). Models of drug-induced liver injury predict phenotypic toxicity rather than specific ligand binding and therefore resemble ototoxicity in terms of the complexity needed for predictive power.…”
Section: Computational Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having a single target simplifies the model: what is the likelihood that the novel structure in question can serve as a ligand for hERG? By contrast, hepatoxicity comprises a heterogenous set of compound classes including protein kinase inhibitors, herbal supplements, and anti-cancer agents (157)(158)(159). Models of drug-induced liver injury predict phenotypic toxicity rather than specific ligand binding and therefore resemble ototoxicity in terms of the complexity needed for predictive power.…”
Section: Computational Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this example, our model shares features with published ototoxicity models but we use a smaller but well-validated training dataset with strict classification of ototoxic vs. non-ototoxic drugs based on peer-reviewed literature drawn from PubMed. As input, we use isomorphic SMILES (simplified molecular-input line-entry system) data for each drug derived from PubChem; this format uses line notation to describe chemical structure as a series of fingerprints and is commonly used for toxicology modeling (151,159,162). This model uses a binary classifier approach where positive scores represent ototoxicity and negative scores represent non-ototoxicity.…”
Section: Computational Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction accuracy values (the invariant accuracy of prediction (IAP) 56 of 0.83 and balanced accuracy of 0.76) for the H-set of drugs is moderate but higher or comparable to those obtained in most of the published studies. 26,27,29,[31][32][33]35,36,39,40,43 The number of false-positive predictions is obviously higher among moderate-DILI-causing than that among non-DILI-causing drugs (Table 2).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, in silico methods offer a time- and cost-efficient way to estimate hepatotoxicity. The structure–activity relationships (SARs) allow predicting DILI based on the structural formula of a compound and, thus, are applicable at the early stages of drug development. Plenty of SAR models for the prediction of DILI have been developed in recent years. The accuracy of the models built varies from 0.6 to 0.9 depending on the data sets, methods, and descriptors. The ensemble approaches ,,, based on the integration of prediction results from many models and created using various machine learning techniques and descriptors, as well as those ,,,, based on deep learning, usually outperform “classical” ones based on the only machine learning method and the only type of descriptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%