2021
DOI: 10.1126/science.abg8794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compositional link between rocky exoplanets and their host stars

Abstract: The interior compositions of small rocky exoplanets cannot be observed directly but are expected to relate to the composition of the host star. Adibekyan et al. analyzed a sample of rocky exoplanets, inferring the planets' iron fractions by combining their masses and radii with an interior structure model. The iron fractions of the host stars were calculated from stellar elemental abundances. The two iron fractions, that of the planets and that of the stars, correlate with each other, but the slope is steeper … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
140
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(91 reference statements)
3
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work we extended the sample of Adibekyan et al (2021) by adding six recently discovered rocky exoplanets and studied the compositional link between rocky exoplanets and their host stars. The main results which confirm the recent findings of A21 are summarized below:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we extended the sample of Adibekyan et al (2021) by adding six recently discovered rocky exoplanets and studied the compositional link between rocky exoplanets and their host stars. The main results which confirm the recent findings of A21 are summarized below:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, for the refractory elements U and Th, we multiply the summand by a common factor χ rad to reflect potentially extraterrestrial variations in the abundances of these r-process elements. As surveyed in Nimmo et al (2020), U and Th abundances are conservatively expected to vary across Sun-like stars from between 30% to 300% of the solar value, which-assuming that relative mantle concentrations directly reflect relative stellar abundances (Thiabaud et al 2015;Hinkel & Unterborn 2018;Putirka & Rarick 2019;Adibekyan et al 2021)-translates to a range in q rad of 2.22-14.34 pW kg −1 at 4.5 Gyr, with the baseline value equivalent to 5.36 × 10 −12 W kg −1 . (We ignore the unconstrained variations in 40 K, a volatile isotope that in any case contributes less heating with age than refractory U and Th.)…”
Section: Heat Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, mantle viscosities, radiogenic heating rates, and core mass fractions all relate to planetary ratios of certain major elements: viscosities decrease with Mg/Si, radiogenic heating rates increase with U/Si and Th/Si, and core mass fractions increase with Fe/O. Exoplanet compositional parameters are not completely inaccessible because refractory element ratios are expected to generally preserve themselves between a star and its planets (Thiabaud et al 2015;Hinkel & Unterborn 2018;Putirka & Rarick 2019;Adibekyan et al 2021). Although pilot work is surely needed, this useful fact means that element abundances from stellar spectra offer a promising constraint on planetary interior dynamics.…”
Section: Constraints From Astrophysical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, upon the application of our devolatilization approach, both carbon and oxygen are severely depleted in rocky planets relative to their host star and therefore, a planetary (not a stellar) C/O is no longer a valid indicator of rocky planets' dominant mineral types (silicates vs. carbides). Due to the refractory nature (and similar T c 50 ; Lodders 2003;Wood et al 2019) of Mg and Si, their ratio in a star is not significantly altered through the devolatilization process (Wang et al 2019a) and thus is still a good first-order proxy for Mg/Si in a rocky planet around the host star (Schulze et al 2021;Adibekyan et al 2021;Thiabaud et al 2014;Delgado Mena et al 2010;Bond et al 2010).…”
Section: Key Geochemical Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations of the chemical compositions of rocky bodies in the Solar System (Wang et al 2019a;Sossi & Fegley 2018;Carlson et al 2014;Grossman & Larimer 1974) and of polluted white dwarfs (Harrison et al 2021(Harrison et al , 2018Doyle et al 2019) lend support to the idea that the chemical composition of "terrestrial" (silicate+metal dominated) planets generally reflects that of their host stars for refractory elements, whereas this expression breaks down for volatile elements (Schulze et al 2021;Adibekyan et al 2021). This discrepancy can be explained by devolatilization processes (Wang et al 2019a;Sossi et al 2019;Norris & Wood 2017;Hin et al 2017) that occurred during the formation and early evolution of the terrestrial planets of our best star-planet sample, the Solar System.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%