1987
DOI: 10.1021/ac00131a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A compositional and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance study of humic and fulvic acid fractions of soil organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
56
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, caution should be exercised in deriving quantitative information from solid state CP/MAS 13 C NMR spectroscopy since this method is based on polarization transfer from protons to carbon atoms and the efficiency of this transfer decreases with the sixth power of the carbon to proton distance. As a result, carbon atoms too far from protons are hardly detected and it is well documented that aromatic moieties in complex mixtures can be markedly underestimated via solid-state CP/MAS 13 C NMR spectroscopy [16,17,18]. Similarly, as recently illustrated by studies on synthetic humic substances [18], carbon atoms in highly cross-linked structures are markedly underestimated as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, caution should be exercised in deriving quantitative information from solid state CP/MAS 13 C NMR spectroscopy since this method is based on polarization transfer from protons to carbon atoms and the efficiency of this transfer decreases with the sixth power of the carbon to proton distance. As a result, carbon atoms too far from protons are hardly detected and it is well documented that aromatic moieties in complex mixtures can be markedly underestimated via solid-state CP/MAS 13 C NMR spectroscopy [16,17,18]. Similarly, as recently illustrated by studies on synthetic humic substances [18], carbon atoms in highly cross-linked structures are markedly underestimated as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, finding an apparently linear relationship between ln(intensity) and contact time [2,3,29,32,33,44,45,49,50,56] is not sufficient to guarantee that an accurate T 1r H value can be determined. Fitting an exponential decay function to the decay phase of VCT data [16,52], essentially an equivalent procedure, suffers from the same problem when slowly cross-polarizing nuclei are present. The VCT experiment will only give accurate T 1r H values when the absence of slowly cross-polarizing nuclei can be assured [46].…”
Section: Vsl and Vct Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent lack of correlation of T 1r H with free radical content [15] is likely to result from the biases of the VCT experiment. Over-estimation of T 1r H values determined from VCT experiments is also a likely cause of apparently inhomogeneous T 1r H in natural organic matter samples, in which T 1r H is reported to be longer for non-protonated carbons [44,49,52].…”
Section: Vsl and Vct Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,25,77,87 This yields the theoretical maximum CP intensity at zero tc if T CH were infinitely short and T 1ρH infinitely long. A simplified version can be used to extrapolate intensities back to tc = 0 or to determine T 1ρH using only the decaying part of the curve mainly controlled by T 1ρH relaxation.…”
Section: Toward Quantitative Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…34,57,65,85,86 Spin counting is also possible with internal standards mixed in with the sample, but these introduce other complexities, including overlap with sample peaks or alterations in the relaxation properties of the standard because of interactions with the sample. 87 Sensitivity also varies with position within the rotor, 34,55,88 and even wellmixed materials may migrate to different parts of the rotor with spinning. Inserts have been used to center a capillary of standard along the axis of a large rotor 72 or to place samples at different points along the rotor axis; 34 presumably, the latter could be used to position a layer of standard separated from the sample.…”
Section: Toward Quantitative Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%