2018
DOI: 10.1111/eci.12986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complex network approach to clinical science

Abstract: Contemporary classification systems assume that psychiatric disorders are expressions of latent disease entities. However, some critics point to the comorbidity problem and other issues that question the validity of the latent disease model. An alternative to this traditional view is the complex network approach. This approach assumes that disorders exist as systems of inter-connected elements, without requiring that the elements are expressions of latent disease entities. Depending on the structure of the net… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the feedback loops emphasized in cognitive behavioral theories of psychopathology have been rigorously investigated in cybernetics and dynamical systems theory (Scheffer, 2009). Illustrating the value of this work, Wittenborn et al (2016) used the ‘causal loop diagrams’ of dynamical systems theory to generate a conceptual model of depression as a dynamical system and dynamical systems concepts such as alternative stable states and critical slowing have already begun to be applied to psychopathology (Hayes et al, 2015; Hofmann & Curtiss, 2018; Nelson et al, 2017; Rikkert et al, 2016). Indeed, there is research examining mental disorders as dynamical systems that predates (e.g.…”
Section: Network Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the feedback loops emphasized in cognitive behavioral theories of psychopathology have been rigorously investigated in cybernetics and dynamical systems theory (Scheffer, 2009). Illustrating the value of this work, Wittenborn et al (2016) used the ‘causal loop diagrams’ of dynamical systems theory to generate a conceptual model of depression as a dynamical system and dynamical systems concepts such as alternative stable states and critical slowing have already begun to be applied to psychopathology (Hayes et al, 2015; Hofmann & Curtiss, 2018; Nelson et al, 2017; Rikkert et al, 2016). Indeed, there is research examining mental disorders as dynamical systems that predates (e.g.…”
Section: Network Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, symptoms are conceptualized as being interdependent and jointly forming a psychopathological mental condition instead of assuming an underlying latent disease or disorder that explains the presence of a number of independent symptoms. 15,19,20 Thus, the network of associations among the symptoms constitutes the syndromes and not the other way around. 15 From a clinical point of view, this perspective…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two years, the network approach has been increasingly used to understand mental disorders as systems of interacting symptoms (Hofmann & Curtiss, 2018; Hofmann, Curtiss, & McNally, 2016; McNally, 2016). According to this approach, each depressive symptom is not reflective of a “depressive disorder” but possesses independent causal powers that influence other symptoms (e.g., insomnia causes fatigue); symptoms are not merely passive indicators of an underlying disease (Borsboom & Cramer, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%