2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2012.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complex event processing approach to perceive the vehicular context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…if E = 0 then (35) return E +1 (36) ← − 1 (37) return E (38) (39) function make prediction(E) (40) ← 0 (41) foreach ∈ (E) do (42) prob ← ∑ ∈E| . = .…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…if E = 0 then (35) return E +1 (36) ← − 1 (37) return E (38) (39) function make prediction(E) (40) ← 0 (41) foreach ∈ (E) do (42) prob ← ∑ ∈E| . = .…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that such activities are organized in a tree structure (see Figure 4), it is possible to assess the similarity between two activities by means of a conceptual distance. For the current scope, we have used the Semantic-Hierarchical Similarity (SHS) [42] that is defined by the formula SHS ( , ) = CCA ( , ) .detail degree .detail degree + .detail degree ,…”
Section: Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide a preliminary test of our proposal, we have made use of the CEP system proposed in [8] to discover the occupants of a vehicle by means of some of its built-in sensors. One of the EPRs of such system intends to perceive if there is a person in the driver seat.…”
Section: Target Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of information fusion for vehicular and driver safety has been explored in recent research [21,88,89]. Current active vehicle safety systems do not take context information into account, e.g., is the driver distracted or not?…”
Section: Context Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%