2016
DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2016.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complex approach to study the Amur leopard using camera traps in Protected Areas in the southwest of Primorsky Krai (Russian Far East)

Abstract: The paper describes the methodology and preliminary results of a complex camera trap study of the Amur leopard. The main studies were concentrated on protected areas: the Land of the Leopard National Park with its buffer zone and the Kedrovaya Pad' Biosphere Reserve, a total area of 3600 km 2 . The first results of the 2014-2015 survey period are presented. According to spatial capture-recapture analysis at least 57 adult Amur leopards occupied the Russian protected areas with the density of about 0.98 individ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using SECR models in Malaysia, Bhutan, Nepal and India showed leopard densities typically were 3–5 leopard/100 km 2 [ 33 , 62 64 ], even in unprotected, human-dominated landscapes [ 65 ], and up to 9–13 leopard/100 km 2 [ 66 68 ]. Only a population of the Critically Endangered Amur leopard was found to have similarly low densities of 1 leopard/100 km 2 [ 69 ]. In our study, both methods for estimating density showed nearly identical results, and the camera-trap data showed a similar minimum number of individuals within the camera-trapping grid as the DNA analysis of scats (eight or nine leopards and nine leopards, respectively), suggesting our density estimate for the core zone of SWS was reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using SECR models in Malaysia, Bhutan, Nepal and India showed leopard densities typically were 3–5 leopard/100 km 2 [ 33 , 62 64 ], even in unprotected, human-dominated landscapes [ 65 ], and up to 9–13 leopard/100 km 2 [ 66 68 ]. Only a population of the Critically Endangered Amur leopard was found to have similarly low densities of 1 leopard/100 km 2 [ 69 ]. In our study, both methods for estimating density showed nearly identical results, and the camera-trap data showed a similar minimum number of individuals within the camera-trapping grid as the DNA analysis of scats (eight or nine leopards and nine leopards, respectively), suggesting our density estimate for the core zone of SWS was reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The border in this region (Figure ) is mostly unfenced except close to a few Chinese villages, but a Russian barbed‐wire “border” fence exists between 200 and 10,000 m from the actual national border. Camera trap monitoring indicates that leopards regularly cross the Russian fence (Vitkalova & Shevtsova, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2015; Jacobson et al . 2016; Vitkalova & Shevtsova 2016); however, little research has been conducted on disease in this species. As lethal diseases have been shown to impede the protection of the wild Amur tiger (Gilbert et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%