2021
DOI: 10.37828/em.2021.46.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A completely resolved phylogenetic tree of British spiders (Arachnida: Araneae)

Abstract: The recent accumulation of increasingly densely sampled phylogenetic analyses of spiders has greatly advanced our understanding of evolutionary relationships within this group. Here, this diverse literature is reviewed and combined with earlier morphological analyses in an attempt to reconstruct the first fully resolved phylogeny for the spider fauna of the British Isles. The resulting tree highlights parts of the group where data are still too limited for a confident assessment of relationships, proposes a nu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 100 publications
(159 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Li (2022) elevated the two subfamilies, Liphistiinae and Heptathelinae, to family ranks, Liphistiidae and Heptathelidae, but provided no additional justification for the taxonomic classification change. Breitling (2022) argued against Li's two-family classification system based on nomenclature, morphology, molecular data and fossils, and recommended to maintain a single family Liphistiidae. We agree with Breitling's argumentation, and follow the classification that we have previously proposed (Xu et al 2015a(Xu et al , b, 2021, which supports two subfamilies in the family Liphistiidae because all members of Liphistiidae share the same plesiomorphic traits mentioned above, although the members of Liphistiinae have signal lines around their burrow entrances, which are often used as one of the diagnostic characters to separate Liphistiinae from Heptathelinae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Li (2022) elevated the two subfamilies, Liphistiinae and Heptathelinae, to family ranks, Liphistiidae and Heptathelidae, but provided no additional justification for the taxonomic classification change. Breitling (2022) argued against Li's two-family classification system based on nomenclature, morphology, molecular data and fossils, and recommended to maintain a single family Liphistiidae. We agree with Breitling's argumentation, and follow the classification that we have previously proposed (Xu et al 2015a(Xu et al , b, 2021, which supports two subfamilies in the family Liphistiidae because all members of Liphistiidae share the same plesiomorphic traits mentioned above, although the members of Liphistiinae have signal lines around their burrow entrances, which are often used as one of the diagnostic characters to separate Liphistiinae from Heptathelinae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%