2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.15.452521
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A completely parameter-free method for graph-based single cell RNA-seq clustering

Abstract: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) offers an unprecedented potential for scrutinizing complex biological systems at single cell resolution. One of the most important applications of scRNAseq is to cluster cells into groups of similar expression profiles, which allows unsupervised identification of novel cell subtypes. While many clustering algorithms have been tested towards this goal, graph-based algorithms appear to be the most effective, due to their ability to accommodate the sparsity of the data, as we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the clustering performance, we compared ADClust with other tools including MultiK, SIMLR, scDeepCluster, SC3, scQcut [36], IKAP, CIDR [37], Seurat (version 3.0), and DESC. As MultiK outputs multiple estimated cluster number, we selected the estimated cluster number with the highest ARI.…”
Section: Benchmark Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate the clustering performance, we compared ADClust with other tools including MultiK, SIMLR, scDeepCluster, SC3, scQcut [36], IKAP, CIDR [37], Seurat (version 3.0), and DESC. As MultiK outputs multiple estimated cluster number, we selected the estimated cluster number with the highest ARI.…”
Section: Benchmark Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As MultiK outputs multiple estimated cluster number, we selected the estimated cluster number with the highest ARI. We set the "NUMC" parameter of SIMLR as a range [2:20] to estimate the cluster number followed ref [36]. We set the true cluster numbers for scDeepCluster since it could not estimate the cluster numbers.…”
Section: Benchmark Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation