2000
DOI: 10.1007/pl00010901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A complete system for the analysis of architectural drawings

Abstract: In this paper, we present a complete system for the analysis of architectural drawings, with the aim of reconstructing in 3D the represented buildings. We successively describe the graphics recognition algorithms used for image processing and feature extraction, the 2D modeling step, which includes symbol recognition and converts the drawing into a description in terms of basic architectural entities, and a proposed 3D modeling process which matches reconstructed floors. The system also includes a powerful and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…But they all failed to handle raster images of drawings. Dosch [24] introduced a framework to generate buildings from drawing images. After vectorizing the raster image to sets of polylines and arcs, they recognized the predefined architectural symbols and extruded 3D models for each floor separately.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But they all failed to handle raster images of drawings. Dosch [24] introduced a framework to generate buildings from drawing images. After vectorizing the raster image to sets of polylines and arcs, they recognized the predefined architectural symbols and extruded 3D models for each floor separately.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing engineering interpretation methods may be roughly classified into five categories, depending on the basic technique they rely on: pixel-level knowledge-independent [6], [7], [9], [10], [11], [22], [23], pixel-level knowledge-dependent [13], [16], [17], [18], [20], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], vectorial-level knowledge-independent [30], [31], [32], [33], vectorial-level knowledge-dependent [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], and hybrid systems [8], [40], [41].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing with previous interpretation systems for engineering drawings [20], [30], [35], [36], [38], [48], our system offers the following novelties: First, to the best of our knowledge, our system represents the first effort in high-level interpretation real-life complex engineering drawings. Second, rather than using "rules + inference" representations, we devise a descriptor-based knowledge representation method through analyzing the human's interpretation processes of complex high-level engineering drawings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By describing contextual knowledge up to the functional level, we obtained very interesting results on a small subset of drawings representing gears, but the method is barely scalable to a larger area of engineering, due to the complexity of the knowledge representation framework and of the interpretation mechanisms. -Architectural drawings where we designed a hierarchical symbol recognition system [15] based on the propagation of geometrical and topological constraints in a network and a complete system going all the way to building a simplified 3D model of the represented house [16]. Once again, the method achieved very interesting results but is hardly scalable, both in terms of robustness to noise and in terms of computational complexity.…”
Section: Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%