A complementary Cyber-Human Systems framework for Industry 4.0 Cyber-Physical Systems

Krugh, Matthew; Mears, Laine

doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2018.01.003

Cited by 88 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is possible to talk about a new CHS (Cyber-human system) ( Figure 3), that updates the simple CPS, including some consideration on how the human element must be integrated, and how human factor is crucial in the higher levels. It is interesting to note that the activities deemed difficult to evolve in the cyber level are the very ones that humans perform naturally, and those, that are inherent in the cyber world, are the ones needing the most attention if we connect the human into the new 'Internet-of-People-and-Things' (Krugh & Mears, 2018). Unlike CPS, CHS has the ability to feedback information at each level, as human workers have an inherent intelligence that can be naturally leveraged for selfadaptive, corrective, and preventative actions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The evolution of man–machine interaction: the role of human in Industry 4.0 paradigm

Nardo

Forino

Murino

2020

Production & Manufacturing Research

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Industry 4.0 is a new paradigm in the manufacturing world and it has deeply changed the Human-machine interaction. This paper focus is on the nature of this interaction, which is made possible thanks to the Internet of Things (IoT), and Cyber-Physical System (CPS). These Industry 4.0 key technologies are studied related to the standard Deming cycle, in order to underline the importance of Humanmachine interaction. The Fourth Industrial Revolution involves several changes in the workforce's key features. In this paper, a new perspective based on the centrality of humans is given in the new Industry era. The importance of the human factor will be deeply studied through the implementation of the 'Sand Cone Model'. A new framework is proposed in order to explain the quality measures addiction on the workforce quality skills, and how it engraves on improving efficiency and effectiveness of an industrial process. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The evolution of man–machine interaction: the role of human in Industry 4.0 paradigm

Nardo

Forino

Murino

2020

Production & Manufacturing Research

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From the perspective of anthropocentric approach, CPS may impact or improve the health, learning, and operative performance of human workers [15]. Integrating human in CPS framework will make manual operations more secure and efficient which will also enhance process control and improve quality especially in product assembly domain [16]. A framework called "CyFL-Matrix" which can help both industrial stakeholders and researchers to navigate the operational and social sustainability performance impacts of improvement projects towards HCPS is proposed in [15].…”

Section: Integrating Human In Cyber-physical Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anthropocentric Approach for Smart Assembly: Integration and Collaboration

Tan

Tong

et al. 2019

Journal of Robotics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, anthropocentric or human-centric approaches renewed its importance in smart manufacturing especially for assembly applications where human dexterity and informal knowledge are dispensable at present and in the near future. This paper analyzes the integration, design, and collaboration issues regarding anthropocentric researches in the past few years mainly in assembly domain. First of all, towards closed-loop system integration, the researches on integrating human in the cyber-physical system are elaborated and summarized. Then, human-centric designs (HCD) especially in shop-floor assembly field are analyzed. To emphasize human-robot hybrid assembly, several related issues including collaboration paradigm, task planning and assignment, interaction interfaces, and safety are discussed. At last, a survey on human cognitive and social limitation management is elaborated. Related research challenges and directions are discussed.

show abstract

“…As a human‐centric smart system, CHS focuses on studying the increasingly coupled relationship between humans and computing to enhance the human capabilities . It is important to accurately acquire the reliable data from humans and their surroundings, and further analyze them by advanced computing to deeply understand the role of human in dynamic scenarios, which are relevant to the interface between humans and information technology.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CHS comprises five invisible levels, I) smart connection, II) data‐to‐information conversion, III) cyber, IV) cognition, and V) configuration . Level I establishes methods for acquiring accurate and reliable data from humans and their surroundings, forming the basis and initial input for other levels.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cyber–Physiochemical Interfaces

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Living things rely on various physical, chemical, and biological interfaces, e.g., somatosensation, olfactory/gustatory perception, and nervous system response. They help organisms to perceive the world, adapt to their surroundings, and maintain internal and external balance. Interfacial information exchanges are complicated but efficient, delicate but precise, and multimodal but unisonous, which has driven researchers to study the science of such interfaces and develop techniques with potential applications in health monitoring, smart robotics, future wearable devices, and cyber physical/human systems. To understand better the issues in these interfaces, a cyber–physiochemical interface (CPI) that is capable of extracting biophysical and biochemical signals, and closely relating them to electronic, communication, and computing technology, to provide the core for aforementioned applications, is proposed. The scientific and technical progress in CPI is summarized, and the challenges to and strategies for building stable interfaces, including materials, sensor development, system integration, and data processing techniques are discussed. It is hoped that this will result in an unprecedented multi‐disciplinary network of scientific collaboration in CPI to explore much uncharted territory for progress, providing technical inspiration—to the development of the next‐generation personal healthcare technology, smart sports‐technology, adaptive prosthetics and augmentation of human capability, etc.

show abstract

A complementary Cyber-Human Systems framework for Industry 4.0 Cyber-Physical Systems

Cited by 88 publications

References 35 publications

The evolution of man–machine interaction: the role of human in Industry 4.0 paradigm

The evolution of man–machine interaction: the role of human in Industry 4.0 paradigm

Anthropocentric Approach for Smart Assembly: Integration and Collaboration

Cyber–Physiochemical Interfaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About