2011
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2011.191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A competitive cell growth assay for the detection of subtle effects of gene transduction on cell proliferation

Abstract: RNA interference (RNAi) is a sequence-specific gene silencing mechanism with therapeutic potential against many human pathogens. To obtain a durable therapeutic effect, stable transduction of target cells with for instance a lentiviral vector that expresses a short hairpin (shRNA) inducer of the RNAi pathway is necessary. Apart from the intended therapeutic effect, this treatment can induce negative effects on cell proliferation via off-target effects. A careful evaluation of the transduced cells is required t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One could for instance determine the cellular doubling time by frequent cell counting. We recently developed a very user-friendly and ultra-sensitive assay that follows over time the ratio of shRNA-expressing GFP-positive cells vs untransduced GFP-negative cells in a co-culture assay [50] . This competitive cell growth or CCG assay has some clear advantages over other well-established cell proliferation assays: (1) After cell transduction, only a small aliquot of the culture is needed to launch the CCG assay, without any extra steps; (2) The CCG assay is internally controlled as it starts with a mixture of transduced and untransduced cells; and (3) Even minor effects on the cellular proliferation rate caused by shRNA expression can be detected.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity In In Vitro Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could for instance determine the cellular doubling time by frequent cell counting. We recently developed a very user-friendly and ultra-sensitive assay that follows over time the ratio of shRNA-expressing GFP-positive cells vs untransduced GFP-negative cells in a co-culture assay [50] . This competitive cell growth or CCG assay has some clear advantages over other well-established cell proliferation assays: (1) After cell transduction, only a small aliquot of the culture is needed to launch the CCG assay, without any extra steps; (2) The CCG assay is internally controlled as it starts with a mixture of transduced and untransduced cells; and (3) Even minor effects on the cellular proliferation rate caused by shRNA expression can be detected.…”
Section: Cytotoxicity In In Vitro Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, we tested the impact of lentivirus-transduced anti-HIV shRNAs cells and initially reported the absence of severe adverse effects [ 114 ]. Using the very sensitive cell competition concept as described above [ 113 ], we noticed a transient negative effect of one of the four shRNAs on T cell development (Fig. 9b ), which allowed us to reformulate the shRNA cocktail [ 115 ].…”
Section: The Humanized Mouse Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As mentioned, silencing of a cellular cofactor can affect cell growth. Although there are several possibilities to score cell growth over time, we realized the need for a simple assay to score subtle cell growth effects and developed the Competitive Cell Growth (CGG assay) [ 113 ]. This method is based on the difference in proliferation rate of transduced (GFP-positive) and untransduced cells in the same culture.…”
Section: Preclinical Safety Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate their individual contribution to the oncogenic activity of miR-125b, we reconstituted three independent clones of miR-125b-transformed cells with cDNA expression constructs encoding the 11 target gene candidates and monitored green fluorescent protein (GFP) as an expression marker in a competitive growth assay over time (Figure 5a). 33 The expression constructs lacked a 3′-UTR and were therefore uncoupled from miR-125b-mediated regulation. We hypothesized that reconstitution of a target whose repression is involved in maintenance of the transformed state should counteract miR-125b function and reduce the percentage of GFP + cells.…”
Section: Mir-125b Acts As An Oncomir In B-cell Precursorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 The fitness of transduced cells compared with non-transduced controls in the same sample was analyzed based on a competitive growth assay. 33 Changes in fluorescent marker expression over time were converted into a growth defect, based on an estimated cell doubling time of 1 day.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%