2006
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A competency‐based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship

Abstract: Corporate entrepreneurship, the discovery and pursuit of new opportunities through innovation and venturing, is an important source of competitive advantage. Corporate entrepreneurship involves a diverse set of activities such as innovation in products and processes; the development of internal and external corporate ventures; and the development of new business models, which require an array of roles, behaviors, and individual competencies. In this article, we define individual competencies and distinguish th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
271
1
14

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
7
271
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The papers in this special issue have highlighted empirically how the individual-organizational level nexus can be explored, yet there are numerous opportunities to examine this nexus using different theoretical approaches. For instance, Rasmussen et al (2011) adopt Hayton and Kelley's (2006) competency theory, built within corporate venturing and use this to explain how academic entrepreneurs develop competencies together with industrial partners in the creation of university spin offs. Such a competency approach could be applied to better explain the relative efficacy of different support measures for academic entrepreneurs such as incubators, accelerators and science and technology parks (Link et al 2015).…”
Section: The Individual-organizational Level Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers in this special issue have highlighted empirically how the individual-organizational level nexus can be explored, yet there are numerous opportunities to examine this nexus using different theoretical approaches. For instance, Rasmussen et al (2011) adopt Hayton and Kelley's (2006) competency theory, built within corporate venturing and use this to explain how academic entrepreneurs develop competencies together with industrial partners in the creation of university spin offs. Such a competency approach could be applied to better explain the relative efficacy of different support measures for academic entrepreneurs such as incubators, accelerators and science and technology parks (Link et al 2015).…”
Section: The Individual-organizational Level Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to bridge knowledge from a variety of organizational domains, i.e., spanning boundaries, is seen as vital to promoting CE (Hayton and Kelley 2006). Managers' boundary-spanning activities have been linked to outcomes closely related to strategic renewal, such as creativity, new product development, and service enhancement (Carlile 2004;Hargadon and Sutton 1997;Tortoriello et al 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of new products and services through innovation is increasingly seen as an essential tool for sustained organizational performance (Covin & Miles, 2007, Zahra & Covin, 1995. This process of renewal through innovation is often referred to as corporate entrepreneurship (Phan, Wright, Ucbasaran & Tan, 2009) and organizations are increasing efforts to build capabilities in this area (Hayton & Kelley, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a significant amount of research has addressed strategies leading to effective innovation within established organizations (Covin & Miles, 2007, Hayton & Kelley, 2006, less is known about the use of management practices in motivating appropriate attitudes and behaviors from employees involved in this effort (Marvel, Griffin, Hebda & Vojak, 2007). The experience of many companies and the results of empirical scientific studies point to the fact that small firms are significantly more innovative than large, while being much more flexible on the issue of the speed of the process of innovation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%