2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58536-5_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Competence-Aware Curriculum for Visual Concepts Learning via Question Answering

Abstract: While significant advancements have been made in video question answering (VideoQA), the potential benefits of enhancing model generalization through tailored difficulty scheduling have been largely overlooked in existing research. This paper seeks to bridge that gap by incorporating VideoQA into a curriculum learning (CL) framework that progressively trains models from simpler to more complex data. Recognizing that conventional self-paced CL methods rely on training loss for difficulty measurement, which migh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have proposed to combine statistical learning and symbolic reasoning, with pioneer efforts devoted to different directions, including representation learning and reasoning (Sun, 1994;Garcez et al, 2008;Manhaeve et al, 2018), abductive learning (Li et al, 2020a;Dai et al, 2019;Zhou, 2019), knowledge abstraction (Hinton et al, 2006;Bader et al, 2009), etc. There also have been recent works on the application of neural-symbolic methods, such as neural-symbolic visual reasoning and program synthesis (Yi et al, 2018;Mao et al, 2018;Li et al, 2020b;Parisotto et al, 2016), semantic parsing (Liang et al, 2016;Yin et al, 2018), and math word problems (Lample & Charton, 2020;Lee et al, 2020). Current neural-symbolic approaches often require a perfect domain-specific language, including both the syntax and semantics of the targeted domain.…”
Section: Neural-symbolic Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have proposed to combine statistical learning and symbolic reasoning, with pioneer efforts devoted to different directions, including representation learning and reasoning (Sun, 1994;Garcez et al, 2008;Manhaeve et al, 2018), abductive learning (Li et al, 2020a;Dai et al, 2019;Zhou, 2019), knowledge abstraction (Hinton et al, 2006;Bader et al, 2009), etc. There also have been recent works on the application of neural-symbolic methods, such as neural-symbolic visual reasoning and program synthesis (Yi et al, 2018;Mao et al, 2018;Li et al, 2020b;Parisotto et al, 2016), semantic parsing (Liang et al, 2016;Yin et al, 2018), and math word problems (Lample & Charton, 2020;Lee et al, 2020). Current neural-symbolic approaches often require a perfect domain-specific language, including both the syntax and semantics of the targeted domain.…”
Section: Neural-symbolic Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual reasoning aims to reason about object properties and their relationships in given images, usually evaluated as the question-answering accuracy (Johnson et al, 2017a;Hudson & Manning, 2018;Mascharka et al, 2018;Hu et al, 2018). Recently, there has been an increasing amount of work has been focusing on using neuro-symbolic frameworks to bridge visual concept learning and visual reasoning (Yi et al, 2018;Li et al, 2020). The high-level idea is to disentangle concept learning: association of linguistic units with visual representations, and reasoning: the ability to count objects or make queries.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Module networks Architectures based on neural module networks (Andreas et al, 2015) have been studied for vision-and-language learning tasks, both in visual grounding (Hu et al, 2016;Yu et al, 2018) and in VQA context (Li et al, 2020;Mao et al, 2019;Yi et al, 2018). Similar to our approach, module networks break the overall architecture into separate modules, each responsible for grounding a specific concept in the input query.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%