Advances in Questionnaire Design, Development, Evaluation and Testing 2019
DOI: 10.1002/9781119263685.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Compendium of Web and Mobile Survey Pretesting Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Las pruebas de consistencia interna y validez estructural son también avales de una correcta cumplimentación. Sin embargo, este método de recogida de información ha ido adquiriendo un interés creciente y su uso se considera habitual en la investigación psicosociológica (Geisen y Murphy, 2020). Futuros estudios deben buscar métodos de muestreo que permitan generalizar los resultados.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Las pruebas de consistencia interna y validez estructural son también avales de una correcta cumplimentación. Sin embargo, este método de recogida de información ha ido adquiriendo un interés creciente y su uso se considera habitual en la investigación psicosociológica (Geisen y Murphy, 2020). Futuros estudios deben buscar métodos de muestreo que permitan generalizar los resultados.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Yet, its current influence on demography and future opportunities for demography may be greater than they appear. Crowdsourced samples are excellent for testing survey designs prior to their deployment via more costly, representative samples, or as preliminary data included in grant applications (Geisen & Murphy, 2020). The demographic diversity present on these platforms makes them useful for targeting specific subpopulations, though these subpopulations may not be representative (Ogletree & Katz, 2020).…”
Section: Crowdsourced Platform Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This format permitted greater geographical diversity and greater access to the cognitive interviews for this group of busy high school students compared to a more traditional in-person cognitive interviewing mode. 30 Verbal consent to take part in the study was obtained from youth aged 18 or over (all interviewees resided in states where the age of majority was 18). For minors, written consent was first obtained from a parent or guardian, followed by verbal assent from the youth.…”
Section: Cognitive Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%