2017
DOI: 10.9790/0853-1605066872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparitive Study of Alvarado Score And Ripasa Score in the Diagnosis Of Acute Appendicitis

Abstract: Acute Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies in clinical practice with estimated life time prevalence approximately 1 in 7.[1] The incidence is 1.5 to 1.9 per 1000 and is approximately 1.4 times greater in men then in women. [2] Aim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score was (89.5%) while ALVARADO score was (79%). The results of this study agreed with the following studies, R.S Raikwar et al study which is done in Indore, India 2017 [1], Shuaib A et al study which is done in Jabriya, Kuwait 2016 [4], Chong CF et al study which is done in Brunei, Darussalam 2011 [5], Pasumarthi V et al study which is done in Karnataka, India 2017 [6], Nanjundaiah N et al study which is also done in Karnataka, India 2012 [7], Subramani B et al study which is done in Chennai, India 2015 [11], Ismail Alnjadat and Baha Abdallah study which is also done in Aqaba, Jordan 2013 [12]. By comparing between the RIPASA and ALVARADO scores for patients who have acute appendicitis and those who don't have in this study, we found that (70.5%) of patients had acute appendicitis and (19%) of them didn't have and there was a statistical significant difference between these two scores with p value < 0.001which reflects fair accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score was (89.5%) while ALVARADO score was (79%). The results of this study agreed with the following studies, R.S Raikwar et al study which is done in Indore, India 2017 [1], Shuaib A et al study which is done in Jabriya, Kuwait 2016 [4], Chong CF et al study which is done in Brunei, Darussalam 2011 [5], Pasumarthi V et al study which is done in Karnataka, India 2017 [6], Nanjundaiah N et al study which is also done in Karnataka, India 2012 [7], Subramani B et al study which is done in Chennai, India 2015 [11], Ismail Alnjadat and Baha Abdallah study which is also done in Aqaba, Jordan 2013 [12]. By comparing between the RIPASA and ALVARADO scores for patients who have acute appendicitis and those who don't have in this study, we found that (70.5%) of patients had acute appendicitis and (19%) of them didn't have and there was a statistical significant difference between these two scores with p value < 0.001which reflects fair accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, regarding to the frequency of symptoms and signs of acute appendicitis, the most frequent symptoms were right iliac fossa pain and tenderness. so it is worth mentioning that both frequent symptoms are identical with R.S Raikwar et al study which is done in Indore, India 2017 [1], H. Mazeh et al study 2007 [8], Sabir S. et al study which is done in Rawalpindi, Pakistan 2017 [9], and Rodrigues & Sindhu study which is done in Tamil Nadu, India 2015 [10] respectively. This study compared the widely used ALVARADO score with the RIPASA score in the study sample.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations