2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-4765-7_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison Study of Face, Gait and Speech Features for Age Estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that our approach has certain limitations, the average age predication error is much lower than that of the existing methodologies [4], [34], [53]. It will be interesting to have longitudinal studies over several years or even decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the fact that our approach has certain limitations, the average age predication error is much lower than that of the existing methodologies [4], [34], [53]. It will be interesting to have longitudinal studies over several years or even decades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Riaz et al [4] proposed a method of estimating human soft biometrics including gender, age, and height from gait data and report RMSE of 11.51 years. Punyani et al [53] used a feature set comprised of facial, gait and speech features to estimate person age. From facial features, they report an MAE of 5.36 years.…”
Section: B Comparison With Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table I, the related reviews on gait-based age estimation [21]- [23] have coverage only up to 2019 and present general overviews on age and gender estimation using gait features. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive survey of scientific literature on age estimation using gait features from 2001 to 2021.…”
Section: Table I Related Reviews On Learning Age From Gaitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hediyeh et al [61] explored step frequency and step length obtained automatically in uncontrolled environments for age and gender classification, achieving an accuracy of 86% for age classification. In a study to compare the performance of face, gait, and speech features, Punyani et al [21] combined gait speed, head-to-body ratio, and gait height to perform age estimation.…”
Section: Biological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation