2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2011.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison study between sodium dodecyl sulfate and sodium dodecyl sulfonate with respect to the thermodynamic properties, micellization, and interaction with poly(ethylene glycol) in aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 reveals that the / v values increase non-linearly with [SDS] well below its CMC, but level off at higher concentration of SDS. This increase in / v values upon micellization can be attributed to the three different factors [33,34]:…”
Section: Volumetric and Compressibility Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 reveals that the / v values increase non-linearly with [SDS] well below its CMC, but level off at higher concentration of SDS. This increase in / v values upon micellization can be attributed to the three different factors [33,34]:…”
Section: Volumetric and Compressibility Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the low concentration range, the increase of Ä is due to the increase of free DBU cations and bromide ions. Above the cmc, the change in specific conductivity has a smaller slope due to two reasons: (a) the binding of a fraction of the counterions around the micellar surface and consequently there is an effective loss of ionic charges and (b) the micelles can also contribute to charge transport to a lesser extent than the free ions owing to their low mobility [33]. The values of degree of counterion binding (g) may be evaluated from the degree of counterion dissociation which is further obtained from the ratio of post-to premicellar slopes using the specific conductance (Ä) isotherms [34].…”
Section: Degree Of Counterion Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable activity was observed when the reaction was conducted in the presence of a sulfite-based surfactant with decreased isentropic compressibility (entry 8), which suggests that the reaction took place in the interior of micelles. 20 The use of surfactants with shorter chain length led to a reduction in catalyst performance, whereas the inclusion of a surfactant with extended chains afforded increased yield (entries 9 and 10). The use of palladium(II) catalyst combined with sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (SDBS) also exhibited superior performance (entry 11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%