Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XXVI 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2572807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison on the use of different satellite multispectral data for the prediction of aboveground biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different ML-based models developed in the literature for prediction of forest AGB. The most fundamental modelling approach to AGB prediction is generalized linear regression that allows to relate model parameters to the response variable via a link function [75], [79], [80]. Furthermore, kernel based learners which include methods such as support vector machine [81]- [83] and Gaussian process regression [84], [85] have proven to be effective for the development of AGB estimation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different ML-based models developed in the literature for prediction of forest AGB. The most fundamental modelling approach to AGB prediction is generalized linear regression that allows to relate model parameters to the response variable via a link function [75], [79], [80]. Furthermore, kernel based learners which include methods such as support vector machine [81]- [83] and Gaussian process regression [84], [85] have proven to be effective for the development of AGB estimation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies performed with satellite multispectral (MS) and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data used vegetation indices (e.g., NDVI, SAVI), vegetation biophysical features (e.g., leaf area index, chlorophyll concentration), textural features (e.g., entropy, variance) and SAR polarimetric indices for the prediction of forest AGB [18]- [20]. A prominent limitation identified with MS data was a high variation in response of the extracted features that depended on the time of acquisition and the spatio-spectral specifications [19], [21]. The main causes of such reduced prediction precision were linked to the seasonal variation of the spectral responses from the forest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many different crops are grown in the vicinity of each other in large scale farming, the spectral properties of the target crop may overlap with those of the nearby crops, thereby resulting in faulty crop maps [8,9].The literature of crop mapping using multispectral remote sensing data establishes that using a single date imagery is a challenging task and yields a less accurate classification of crops. Temporal multispectral images have been effectively used for different applications of remote sensing and have delivered more accurate results for multiple studies as compared to single date images [10][11][12][13][14]. Similarly, multiple studies have developed methods based on temporal multispectral data in agricultural applications including specific crop identification [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%